Hello all,
After a long period of development I'm happy to announce that OpenEcoMaps is
basically functional: http://www.openecomaps.co.uk
OpenEcoMaps takes data about “eco” (green / sustainable) features stored in
OpenStreetMap and turns them into KML files that are shown as overlays on
the
On 11 April 2011 23:39, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 9 April 2011 08:15, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com mailto:
peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
...
We seem to be nudging towards something close to a conclusion.
Can I suggest that the following two
On 12/04/2011 09:38, Peter Miller wrote:
On 11 April 2011 23:39, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk
mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
We've lost the information that the sign is actually NOT a 60 mph
sign. Something like method 2 above would have avoided losing
On 11/04/2011 23:39, SomeoneElse wrote:
Great - someone has now changed a bunch of maxspeed=national locally
to me to to maxspeed=60 mph. Next I guess someone will come along
and add
source:maxspeed=i_was_sat_in_my_armchair_and_it_seemed_like_a_good_idea
or similar?
We've lost the
On 12 April 2011 11:04, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
SomeoneElse lists@... writes:
I can still map maxspeed=what_the_sign_says as I have been doing.
Maybe it would be best to tag that as maxspeed_sign=what_the_sign_says.
Probably maxspeed:sign would be better than maxspeed_sign.
I do
I apologise for editing too soon and having taken silence as agreement. I
will not any more editing of maxspeed while we resolve this issue.
In my defense I would note again that a considerable percentage of
unrestricted roads in the UK had already been tagged in numeric format and
that my manual
On 12/04/11 09:38, Peter Miller wrote:
The general conclusion of the discussion above was that where
maxspeed=60mph is applied to a single carriageway road there is also a
default 'maxspeed:type=GB:unrestricted' (or whatever value is decided
on). This default (and the one for 70mph for
I just heard about this, I don't know anything about the group but I thought
I'd pass it on since it's using openstreetmap
http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/maps/
Cheers
Bob___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Is this working? I just noticed that, for Meopham in Kent, I can view
the 1:25k OS map as a background in Potlatch 1, but nothing displays in
Potlatch 2.
--
Steve
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Bob Kerr wrote:
I just heard about this, I don't know anything about the group but I
thought I'd pass it on since it's using openstreetmap
http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/maps/
They have links to a number of growing historic maps as well as OSM ... the
National Library of Scotland archive is
On 12 April 2011 12:30, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 12/04/11 09:38, Peter Miller wrote:
The general conclusion of the discussion above was that where
maxspeed=60mph is applied to a single carriageway road there is also a
default 'maxspeed:type=GB:unrestricted' (or whatever value
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Steve wrote:
Is this working? I just noticed that, for Meopham in Kent, I can
view
the 1:25k OS map as a background in Potlatch 1, but nothing
displays
in
Potlatch 2.
It looks like Potlatch 1 is loading .jpg and Potlatch 2
A bit of cash maybe?
http://opendatachallenge.org/
Cheers
Bob___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Peter Miller peter.miller@... writes:
Are people happy with:
GB:motorway (which implies 70 mph at present and possibly 80 mph in the future)
GB:dual_carriageway (which implies 70 mph at present)
GB:single_carriageway (which implies 60 mph at present)
I think this is a sensible scheme and can go
On 12/04/2011 15:08, Andy Allan wrote:
I've just created the patch to fix this, and if anyone notices any
more mistakes (or omissions) in
http://git.openstreetmap.org/potlatch2.git/blob/HEAD:/resources/imagery.xml
then let us know, either by trac tickets or on the potlatch-dev list.
Many
On 12/04/2011 15:16, Ed Avis wrote:
Peter Millerpeter.miller@... writes:
Are people happy with:
GB:motorway (which implies 70 mph at present and possibly 80 mph in the future)
GB:dual_carriageway (which implies 70 mph at present)
GB:single_carriageway (which implies 60 mph at present)
I
On 12/04/2011 15:15, Bob Kerr wrote:
A bit of cash maybe?
http://opendatachallenge.org/
Headline sponsor: Google!
--
Steve
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 12 Apr 2011, at 14:14, Lester Caine wrote:
Bob Kerr wrote:
I just heard about this, I don't know anything about the group but I
thought I'd pass it on since it's using openstreetmap
http://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/maps/
They have links to a number of growing historic maps as well as
18 matches
Mail list logo
