Hi Jon,
As OSM is changing data licence on 1st April [1] there has been an
un-coordinated effort underway globally to replace OSM data that is
incompatible with the new licence. The primary reason for incompatibility is
where a mapper has declined (or not yet decided) to sign up to the
Brian, Ian others,
I can't for the life of me remember what we decided last month for the next
social location (for April 5th). I recall we also talked about a mapping day
soon in Hampton in Arden or Henley in Arden (was it the latter?) and I note
both (and Tamworth-in Arden) could be the basis
On 25/03/2012 11:40, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
On 23 March 2012 12:58, Nick Whiteleggnick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Incidentally, is just knowing the footpaths evidence enough to tag with
odbl=clean? Or is there the risk that the footpath was created with iffy
sources?
While we're on this
On 26 March 2012 14:29, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.com wrote:
Although I'm only a lurker on openstreetmap and talk-gb, my understanding
is that the DfT did not do this and that whoever did add HS2 to OSM would
probably not want it deleted. If this is right, then maybe somebody who
On 26 March 2012 14:51, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
I'm trying to explain it all to the group members, it might help if the
route were named 'Proposed HS2 route' or similar.
Well, it would help if the standard layer only showed names for thing
that it was otherwise drawing. But in
Michael Collinson wrote:
The test I apply here is, Can I independently verify from personal knowledge
ALL the tagging and location info before using odbl=clean. For footpaths, that
may mean removing designation tags if you can't remember whether it is footpath
or a bridle way. Look out also for
Andy Allan wrote:
I'm trying to explain it all to the group members, it might help if the
route were named 'Proposed HS2 route' or similar.
Well, it would help if the standard layer only showed names for thing
that it was otherwise drawing. But in general, I would expect to find
anti-HS2
I added the data as a proposed rail route using the DfT's published info.
It's unfortunate that Mapnik renders the name on the route which is why it
shows up on the default map. My original Changesets were as below:
#1048624024 January, 2012 17:15 Proposed HS2 rail route (Data
provided
Thanks Tom. I've now added a note on the Facebook page too.
Changing the name Tag might quieten things a bit. Better still would be not
have Mapnik display the name tag at all (since its not displaying the route
otherwise) so we could just move the name to another tag?
Thoughts anyone?
Andy Allan gravitystorm@... writes:
If anyone wants to investigate the changesets so far, then these two
users are involved, perhaps others too:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/GMetcalfe
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/HAHS2
And http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Say%20no%20to%20HS2
Delighted to report that Andy Street has agreed to the CTs. Thank you Andy.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Remapping-update-tp5573600p5596324.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 26 March 2012 21:42, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Delighted to report that Andy Street has agreed to the CTs. Thank you Andy.
This is great news. Thanks Andy and I'm glad you were able to resolve
any problems you had with the CTs/license.
--
Matt Williams
On 26 March 2012 18:43, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Tom. I’ve now added a note on the Facebook page too.
All comments relating to OSM have now been deleted from the group, which
carries a message saying:
DO NOT add members whom you do not know or are not referred by other
User Say no to HS was just a rename from the original GMetcalfe.
I've now reverted the 5 changesets from these two accounts. I'll look at
changing the name tag on the HS2 data when I get a moment to avoid problems
in the future.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andrew
14 matches
Mail list logo
