On 03/05/12 21:34, Andy Street wrote:
So you are saying that we should tag paths by who uses them but not do
the same for tracks. IMHO that is rather inconsistent.
Not quite. I'm advancing that one should classify according to the
primary use or build when one has sufficient evidence. Schemes
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:32 +0100, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
On 03/05/12 21:34, Andy Street wrote:
No. Designation tags imply nothing in OSM right now, as currently
documented, and by design IIRC. Also, I refer you to the recent mailing
list post regarding other countries and what they might
P.S. It would appear that this thread is at risk of turning into a
difference of opinions between two individuals rather than a
discussion
amongst the wider community. Out of consideration for the other
users of
this list I will therefore not be making any further replies to
this
thread.
3 matches
Mail list logo
