We had tentative plans for some mapping in Banbury on Oct 5th. I suspect
because of all the other things that have been going on its slipped from
everyone's mind (it certainly has from mine). I now find I can't make the
5th as originally proposed, just wondering how many wish to keep it as it is
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 22:09 +0100, Andy Street wrote:
I'd agree that maxspeed=national is insufficient as it is impossible
to tell what speed you can do in a built up area.
National speed limits rarely apply in built up areas, other than
sometimes on faster feeder roads. The built up area limit
Hello all,
I'm trying to get this user account suspended/banned:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Quercus1/edits
I have tried contacting him/her to no avail. All these edits are bogus and
many involve the deletion of features.
I emailed the DWG but got no response, and the wiki page is a bit
Hi,
On 09/23/13 12:39, Tom Chance wrote:
I emailed the DWG but got no response, and the wiki page is a bit
unclear as to whether this can be dealt with in the community (mailing
lists?) or by the DWG.
It seems you have already repaired the most obvious damage yourself.
Indeed DWG prefers it
On 23 September 2013 11:39, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
I'm trying to get this user account suspended/banned:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Quercus1/edits
Whilst, if they fail to respond to a direct approach, such steps may
be needed...
I have tried contacting him/her to no
OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
The edits seem to be seriously incompetent, rather than actually
bogus, or malicious.
What they've added is mostly just untagged ways (sometimes for
buildings, sometimes perhaps fences, sometimes unclear). I'd mostly
therefore mostly agree with incompetence rather
On 23 September 2013 12:22, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
It seems you have already repaired the most obvious damage yourself.
Of the changesets in my local area - others covered some other edits.
Indeed DWG prefers it if such issues can be resolved by the community
through
On 23 September 2013 12:27, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The edits seem to be seriously incompetent, rather than actually
bogus, or malicious.
I'm not sure, they are strange edits. On the one hand there are some
outlines of actual features, on the other hand there are
* random
OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
Incidentally, is there any easy way of rendering a before image of a
change?
A couple of possibilities:
o If you're quick, the Cycle Map layer on osm.org might show the old
version. There are also many other OSM-based online maps, many of which
don't update as
On 23 September 2013 16:01, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
* changesets with the same comment that doesn't correspond with the
thing they have traced, like This is a House
Unfortunately, like subjects on many PC support forums, the average
contributor doesn't seem to be able
Can we check their IP? Didn't something similar happen with some Google
employees vandalizing OSM a few years ago?
Chris
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
On 23 September 2013 16:01, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
* changesets with the same
On 23/09/13 14:08, Tom Chance wrote: On 23 September 2013 12:27,
OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com
mailto:osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The edits seem to be seriously incompetent, rather than actually
bogus, or malicious.
I'm not sure, they are strange edits. On the one hand there are
Apologies for being slow to pick this one up. I was in private discussion
with Andy on this using OSM messaging which appeared to have come to a
conclusion. I now notice that it had moved to talk-gb.
For avoidance of doubt, all my edits have been fully manual.
Here is the explanation I gave to
On 23 September 2013 18:47, Peter Oliver p.d.oli...@mavit.org.uk wrote:
Didn't someone mention that this user was using JOSM? JOSM pre-populates
the comment field with the previously submitted comment.
The other thing it does is to add to an existing changeset, and the
changeset is left
Frederik Ramm wrote:
(the *ideal* but often utopian course of action being that the user
sees his mistake and fixes it himself!),
In my personal experience, mappers that are still engaged with the
project *1 normally do reply to a hello-and-welcome-but-by-the-way
message positively *2, and
I'm buried in other code at the moment so don't have time to dig for an
answer,
so can someone point me in the right direction to get a 'search result' via
the
API for looking up a location.
I know I can go via the website, but I need to be able to search for
Hi,
On 23.09.2013 17:22, SomeoneElse wrote:
o If you're quick, the Cycle Map layer on osm.org might show the old
version. There are also many other OSM-based online maps, many of which
don't update as quickly as the osm.org standard map.
o A local server using a small rendering database
Hi Andy,
== You may need to forward this to the Oxon list as I'm not subscribed ==
We hadn't forgotten that there were plans to meet-up but it had slipped my
mind that we had already picked a date. Given that you weren't able to
attend SOTM, I'm quite happy to change the date to one that you are
18 matches
Mail list logo
