Just went on the mobile website from my Nexus phone and it looks much
better than before, really can't see a problem with the mobile version of
the new osm. At the same time, you can never, ever, please everybody...
Also, I don't think it wise to talk about turning others away when not
many others
+1 for a close button. That box just screams at me to be closed - my brain
wants to see what's behind it! Not sure what communication went out about
this notifying the community of the date of implementation - I certainly
wasn't aware of anything. I saw lots of discussion about the design but
I think you've just summed up the real power of Open Data, specifically
Open Map Data. If you don't like how it is rendered then choose another
renderer or render the data yourself.
So cool! Everyone's happy. Try viewing Google's or Microsoft's data
some other way if you don't like their
But Brian, why aren't you logged in? It's not there then.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 18:45, Brian Prangle wrote:
+1 for a close button. That box just screams at me to be closed - my
brain wants to see what's behind it! Not sure what communication went
out about this
At least they could have the grace to spell licence correctly.
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for a close button. That box just screams at me to be closed - my
brain wants to see what's behind it! Not sure what communication went out
about this
Or at the very least choose one spelling and stick with it!
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 18:51, Richard Mann wrote:
At least they could have the grace to spell licence correctly.
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com
mailto:bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian,
(I tried my best to communicate this change - oh, and it was also at SOTM
2013 :-P )
I agree that these changes should be communicated better which is exactly
why I posted news of this change to both the talk and talk-gb mailing list
a few weeks ago. I was only aware of it's imminent
On 01/12/13 19:14, Brian Prangle wrote:
@Rob - I know you communicated this change and asked for feedback for
which I'm grateful- I'm just pissed off that there was no obvious
communication of the date of implementation - at best that's just
unprofessionally poor communication, at worst it's
On 1 December 2013 19:03, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For most users, you just need to log-in and tick the always stay logged
in button and the welcome box will go. As an often requested feature I am
sure that someone will write the required code to add a close button (or my
Hi,
On 01.12.2013 21:00, Oliver Jowett wrote:
What's the workaround for users that do not wish to retain cookies?
GreaseMonkey could be an option.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-GB
On 1 December 2013 20:19, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 01.12.2013 21:00, Oliver Jowett wrote:
What's the workaround for users that do not wish to retain cookies?
GreaseMonkey could be an option.
The barrier to entry in setting that up is a bit high for me unfortunately
Hi,
On 01.12.2013 21:32, Oliver Jowett wrote:
The barrier to entry in setting that up is a bit high for me
unfortunately (unless you have a script already prepared?)
This'll do:
// ==UserScript==
// @name Remove OSM welcome box
// @include http://www.openstreetmap.org/*
//
On 1 December 2013 20:46, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 01.12.2013 21:32, Oliver Jowett wrote:
The barrier to entry in setting that up is a bit high for me
unfortunately (unless you have a script already prepared?)
This'll do:
Works like a charm! Thanks :)
Oliver
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Thirdly; there is no they, only we. OSM, all of it, map and code equally, is
made by its contributors. So when Brian says Surely we can do better than
this?: Yes. We can. But only if you're prepared to be part of the we.
The main problem with that statement is that not
14 matches
Mail list logo
