On 12/05/2016 23:13, David Woolley wrote:
They started their life being purely for private profit, got
nationalised, then handed to a charity, but never got made public
rights of way.
It depends where you are, I think. Certainly the canal towpath nearest
to me (Cromford Canal) is mostly
On 12/05/16 12:30, Eric Grosso wrote:
At the moment, the different tags (in link with this discussion) used
for these ways are:highway=path, surface=paved, bicycle=designated,
segregated=no, width=1.75, ncn_ref=754 (Tobi added yesterday a ncn_ref
in addition to the associated relation).
For
May be of interest to some:
http://www.bathhacked.org/projects/bath-cycling/strava-metro-interacting-data/
*Rob*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
the OSMF would like to hire someone for part-time (max 2 days/week)
work, helping with administrative tasks. Please see the detailed job
posting here on the Wiki:
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Administrative_Assistant
Since we're an UK organisation, having someone in the UK would
Craig Wallace wrote:
> Maybe the consensus in England.
> In Scotland, where paths can be used on foot, bicycle, horse etc,
> then highway=path makes sense. And that is how they are
> generally tagged in OSM.
Yes, access laws are indeed different in Scotland to England & Wales.
However, the
On 2016-05-11 06:44, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
On 10/05/2016 20:59, Eric Grosso wrote:
What do you think? Do we, OSM contributors, tag all the highways part of
a NCN as cycleways? What to do when in some cases, a highway is both
part of a NCN route and a hiking route (e.g the John Muir Way)?
Thanks Chris, thanks Richard.
If we take the example of the Union Canal Towpath (e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222362355), it was originally a footway,
upgraded (i.e. resurfaced) at several points in time (but a lot have been
done in 2005-2006), so it became easier and easier for
7 matches
Mail list logo
