Basic agreement with Colin.
The 'problem' is better described as 'data bloat' rather than 'quality'
which implies inaccuracy.
I add the following observation
I am beginning to see that the ways should have a source tag.
This then means that where ways are coincident that the sources
Mike,
not sure I would call it a real data quality issue, but it "could be
better".
There are two coincident lines, which share some nodes but do not share
the majority of nodes, despite the fact they are coincident.
One line represents the boundary of Great Britain, and the admin
boundary
If I put Drimnin in the centre of my tablet's screen in an area of 780m EW and
515m NS (landscape) the land/sea boundary is marked (not always accurately) by
a number of coincident way/relation/multipolygon items all of which pass
through 49 things that look like nodes.
There are actually 71
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 368,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9359/
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM?
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages
On 11/08/17 11:44, Chris Jones wrote:
> For OSM that would mean translating the website/interface, providing a
> localised render (like cyosm did), and improving the name:cy coverage.
> It does not mean shoving both English and Welsh version in the same name
> tag to everybody's detriment.
As
Brian Prangle wrote:
> You have raised a subject which needs attention but we don't
> have an active community in Wales, just individual mappers
I don't find that a helpful distinction. Aside from a few places (London,
Birmingham, Edinburgh, the North-East Midlands), OSM in the UK doesn't have
6 matches
Mail list logo
