Re: [Talk-GB] Automated Code-Point Open postcode editing (simple cases only)

2019-07-17 Thread Devonshire
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > In that case maybe it would be a good idea to merge existing address-only > nodes > with building outlines as the first step? Some buildings (usually post office locations but also some others such as council offices) can have more

Re: [Talk-GB] Automated Code-Point Open postcode editing (simple cases only)

2019-07-17 Thread Andrzej
These should reasonably easy to remove from the dataset, easier than checking for existing addresses. Thanks for the suggestion. Best regards, ndrw6 On 17 July 2019 18:09:39 BST, David Woolley wrote: >On 16/07/2019 22:19, ndrw6 wrote: >> 3. Use a collation plugin to collate both datasets

Re: [Talk-GB] Automated Code-Point Open postcode editing (simple cases only)

2019-07-17 Thread David Woolley
On 16/07/2019 22:19, ndrw6 wrote: 3. Use a collation plugin to collate both datasets with "centroid distance" set to "< 15m". The condition is there to apply postcodes only to small buildings in direct vicinity of the codepoint centroid. This algorithm will apply PO Box number postcodes to

Re: [Talk-GB] Automated Code-Point Open postcode editing (simple cases only)

2019-07-17 Thread Andrzej
I will try to avoid adding postcodes in these cases. Basically, narrow down the list of postcodes to add to these that don't have any neighbouring objects with addr: tags. Best regards, ndrw6 On 17 July 2019 12:10:32 BST, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >17 Jul 2019, 12:58 by nd...@redhazel.co.uk:

Re: [Talk-GB] Automated Code-Point Open postcode editing (simple cases only)

2019-07-17 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
17 Jul 2019, 12:58 by nd...@redhazel.co.uk: > I haven't seen such guidelines for the UK myself. In general people prefer > having address tags on buildings. Separate address points are more of a stop > gap solution until building shapes are sufficiently accurate. > In that case maybe it would

Re: [Talk-GB] Automated Code-Point Open postcode editing (simple cases only)

2019-07-17 Thread Andrzej
I haven't seen such guidelines for the UK myself. In general people prefer having address tags on buildings. Separate address points are more of a stop gap solution until building shapes are sufficiently accurate. An exception is addresses on entrances, which some mappers seem to prefer. I

Re: [Talk-GB] Automated Code-Point Open postcode editing (simple cases only)

2019-07-17 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
16 lip 2019, 23:19 od nd...@redhazel.co.uk: > added as separate points rather than tags (automated edit will add > addr:postcode tags directly to the building, this is what I chose to do > manually as well) > Duplicating address data or adding part to a separate node and part to building