Re: [Talk-GB] Removing all stiles from bridleways

What distinction would you make between this and the cycle route over steps that was discussed recently or the signposted cycle route past cycle barriers in Barnes, London? -- Andrew From: Richard Fairhurst Sent: 14 December 2020 20:57 To: talk-gb OSM List (E

Re: [Talk-GB] British Waterways

On 07/12/2020 10:33, Richard Fairhurst wrote: TBH there's only 170 operator=British Waterways tags according to taginfo, so it could be polished off pretty quickly with an Overpass query and a manual edit. Agreed. But (correct me if I am wrong) that is still an automated edit.

Re: [Talk-GB] Hello world and automated change proposal: Add missing URL scheme on UK's Pubs websites

Keep Right flags web links that have gone offline. -- Andrew From: Philip Barnes Sent: 27 September 2020 18:49 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hello world and automated change proposal: Add missing URL scheme on UK's Pubs websites On Sun

Re: [Talk-GB] Eat out to help out data

On 20/08/2020 12:28, Andy Townsend wrote: Perhaps "opening_hours:covid19=open"? Even that's a bit tricky - if an establishment is registered with the scheme I guess it doesn't guarantee that it is _currently_ open. This is (IMHO) part of  a bigger problem that opening times are changing

[Talk-GB] Paths on Wimbledon Common

? * -- * Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

If there are more than 19 UPRNs for the same building the reference will be longer than OSM’s tag value limit of 255 characters. -- Andrew From: Tony OSM Sent: 03 July 2020 15:31 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging As we

Re: [Talk-GB] Land Registry INSPIRE data - 1 July OGL release

A lightning talk could get some attention, including mappers with experience of datasets elsewhere in the world. -- Andrew From: Rob Nickerson Sent: 26 June 2020 20:49 To: Talk-GB Subject: [Talk-GB] Land Registry INSPIRE data - 1 July OGL release Hi all

Re: [Talk-GB] Adding missing roads using Facebook detections

Also seen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84550786 -- Andrew From: Chris Fleming Sent: 03 April 2020 14:06 To: Guthula, Jothirnadh Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Adding missing roads using Facebook detections I've spotted some

Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London?

I wonder if Tfondie who created the Wikipedia page may be the same person. -- Andrew From: Andrew Hain Sent: 23 March 2020 20:18 To: Colin Smale Cc: Talk-GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London? There is now a place name Stadium Village just

Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London?

There is now a place name Stadium Village just north of Twickenham town centre that is unfamiliar to me (I live across the Thames). The linked Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadium_Village,_Middlesex exists but reads oddly. -- Andrew From: Andrew

Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London?

in Twickenham may be legitimate and the department store tagging was by another mapper by an editor preset. -- Andrew From: Colin Smale Sent: 20 March 2020 18:46 To: Andrew Hain Cc: Talk-GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London? On 2020-03-20 19:36, Andrew

Re: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London?

Also changing the name tag for Eel Pie Island. -- Andrew From: Colin Smale Sent: 20 March 2020 17:11 To: Talk-GB Subject: [Talk-GB] Anyone in South-West London? If there is anyone who keeps a weather eye on South-West London, in particular the Twickenham

[Talk-GB] C roads again

Is there a resource I can point anyone who puts C numbers in the ref tag of roads at? -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] OS Map Rules

(map and compass) a route along those paths. If I get a GPS trace (e.g. with OSMTracker) while I walk that route, is it acceptable to use this GPS data to update OSM, or would it be considered a derivative of OS data? Kind regards, Andrew Soon-to-be contributor (hopefully

Re: [Talk-GB] FIXME/fixme/OSm Notes Quarterly Project

On 2019-10-21 11:26, Andy Townsend wrote: I don't have data for the whole UK, but do have numbers for "OSM notes" and "fixme tags" for a couple of areas going back at least a couple of years. If people are interested I could pull the numbers together. I'd be interested in seeing these

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

We can check for properties where the brand:wikidata tag was left behind by checking the other tags, particularly name= and shop=. -- Andrew From: SK53 Sent: 28 September 2019 17:32 To: Silent Spike Cc: Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook

Re: [Talk-GB] sidewalks

I am inclined to agree with this though I would distinguish between non-traversable paths that can be mapped with their connections and continuously connected traversable ones that should just have their existence marked on their ways. -- Andrew From: SK53

Re: [Talk-GB] road relations

be relaxed if we did the same. -- Andrew associatedStreet-Relationen entfernen? / users: Germany / OpenStreetMap Forum<https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65510> Die Relationen bei mir in der Gegend wurden teilweise seit Jahren nicht mehr aktualisiert oder überhaupt verändert. Die m

Re: [Talk-GB] Missing Captcha when adding event in OSM wiki

Have you tried using the link at the bottom of the page to switch between mobile and desktop view before you edit? -- Andrew From: n...@posteo.net Sent: 27 April 2019 15:19 To: Talk GB Subject: [Talk-GB] Missing Captcha when adding event in OSM wiki Hi I

Re: [Talk-GB] Road name contradictions in the UK

Is this something that could go in Survey Me? -- Andrew From: Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc) via Talk-GB Sent: 22 February 2019 20:47 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-GB] Road name contradictions in the UK Hi Everyone, Our Open Maps team

Re: [Talk-GB] Fw: Road name contradictions in the UK

182691 | OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346182691> OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license. www.openstreetmap.org -- Andrew From: Jez Nicholson Sent: 07 March 2019 14:19 To: talk-gb@opens

[Talk-GB] Map the path + motorways

*> According to Nick's MapthePaths site* *> (which incidentally also uses newer OS raster data) * *> there are quite a few missing PRoW in the area too.* Ho hum - some paths south of Croydon I thought of mapping but they were a bit too close to the M25 for comfort.

[Talk-GB] Climbing new heights in “interesting” tagging

Road signs tagged natural=peak: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5890628170 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5890628171 -- Andrew [https://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-cde84d7490f0863c7a0b0d0a420834ebd467c1214318167d0f9a39f25a44d6bd.png]<https://www.openstreetmap.org/n

Re: [Talk-GB] Facebook Map Query - Thames rendered as Thanames

I have seen similar but can't recall where or which tile provider. To state obvious, it only occurs at certain zoom levels. Once i realised it was probably transient I lost interest. On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, 01:44 Steve Doerr, wrote: > A user on the Facebook group 'UK Places Editors' has

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

. -- Andrew From: Robert Skedgell Sent: 19 September 2018 21:24 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database On 19/09/2018 16:04, Andrew Black wrote: > There is a very big difference > > - c

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

There is a very big difference - ceremonial counties exist now and so are in scope for OSM. As you say here are differences between them and admin counties when unitary authorties are involved - traditional counties are an attempt to recreate the past So I don't think these trad counties have

Re: [Talk-GB] Wickham Market, Suffolk

Does it measure importance sensibly or is it a category only weakly related to importance like the authority that maintains roads? -- Andrew From: Mark Goodge Sent: 07 September 2018 14:51 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Wickham Market

Re: [Talk-GB] GB does not include Northern Ireland

Although Dave’s edits left out Northern Ireland, (https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-gb@openstreetmap.org/msg16162.html) the question of whether similar edits should take place there was left open. -- Andrew From: Brian Prangle Sent: 29 August 2018 13:20

Re: [Talk-GB] GB does not include Northern Ireland

Imposing strict boundaries on OSM communication channels (in this case a non-ISO3166 meaning for a talk list) is out of order and is not a proper response to any disagreement anyone may have about tagging. -- Andrew From: webmas...@killyfole.org.uk Sent: 28

Re: [Talk-GB] Road refs

Toby, I really think you need to read through the conversation archived at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/thread.html and answer the points discussed there. --<https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-gb@openstreetmap.org/> Andrew ___

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

> > On 26 August 2018 16:27:58 CEST, Andrew Black > wrote: >> >> I agree with Dave F " It's still historic data, irrelevant to OSM. They >> are neither "current or real". That they will "never change" is irrelevant. >> They add no quality to

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

I agree with Dave F " It's still historic data, irrelevant to OSM. They are neither "current or real". That they will "never change" is irrelevant. They add no quality to the database.They should be removed." On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 12:58, Colin Smale wrote: > I agree, but where do we

Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added to the database

Postal counties (mainly a outer London and Manchester thing in this context) are essentially defunct. -- Andrew From: Martin Wynne Sent: 10 August 2018 13:00:40 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] 'historic' county boundaries added

[Talk-GB] FHRS Errors was Re: Updates to 'Survey Me!' tool

I did manage to get the council to remove a long closed pub from FHRS. I have cases where both old and businesses are listed. Worried that an armchair mapper will revert an update to OSM. On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, 10:24 Gregrs, wrote: > Hi Colin, > > >Oh and another where the fhrs listing has the

Re: [Talk-GB] 'C' class roads references.

Are you offering to create a map with this level of special cases for every country in the world? I’d love to see the result. -- Andrew From: David Woolley Sent: 04 August 2018 09:55 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] 'C' class roads references

Re: [Talk-GB] Bartholomews, Brighton

And calling city council officers idiots is not the most helpful of changeset comment. On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 16:39 Martin Wynne, wrote: > > And, since that also matches what's on the ground, > > What's on the ground is that a property in Avenue has a postal address > in East Street, so maybe

Re: [Talk-GB] Updates to 'Survey Me!' tool

Where I live businesses that are still open sometimes drop out of FHRS. Your mileage may very. -- Andrew From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) Sent: 23 July 2018 10:52 To: talk-gb Subject: [Talk-GB] Updates to 'Survey Me!' tool A couple of minor updates to my

Re: [Talk-GB] Documenting prow_ref formats (Was: MapthePaths & Lancashire)

.@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 July 2018 at 19:26, Andrew Black > wrote: > > I am pondering a similar but simpler question. I would like to add a > table > > listing each authority at https://wiki.openstreetmap. > org/wiki/Key:prow_ref > > describing the conventions

Re: [Talk-GB] MapthePaths & Lancashire

I am pondering a similar but simpler question. I would like to add a table listing each authority at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow_ref describing the conventions used. With a subpage if there is a lot of info such as Toby's list for Lancashire I have added the first prow_ref for

Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths update: live edit of designation and prow_ref

I am getting "your editing session has timed out, please log in again." despite having logged in less than a minute earlier. Chrome if it is relevant Thanks On 7 July 2018 at 19:45, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > > 401 would mean you're not logged in.. when you login it stores your OAuth > token in a

Re: [Talk-GB] New Data in PRoW Comparison Tool

Could we follow the signage for the prow_ref format where the authority puts it on signs? -- Andrew From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) Sent: 05 July 2018 09:17:10 To: talk-gb Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] New Data in PRoW Comparison Tool On 3 July 2018 at 15:10

Re: [Talk-GB] Local names of bits of trunk roads

You might want to ask for Nominatim to return relations for queries of road names. -- Andrew From: Paul Berry Sent: 25 June 2018 15:59:36 To: David Woolley Cc: Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Local names of bits of trunk roads Someone's had a brave go

Re: [Talk-GB] Local names of bits of trunk roads

You could also check the way histories to see if the local road names have been mapped in the past. -- Andrew From: Adam Snape Sent: 25 June 2018 17:11:04 To: Stuart Reynolds Cc: Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Local names of bits of trunk roads And, to actually

[Talk-GB] Bing maps

I had a look at the Bing map of Richmond this morning. It now has houses on it, or rather it has some of them. The resulting map looks, shall I say, familiar if a bit out of date. -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https

Re: [Talk-GB] Has someone just given us (the start of) access to the crown jewels?

The property extents might be something that can be turned into landuse polygons. The existing ones where I live are very low quslity. -- Andrew From: Tim Waters Sent: 14 June 2018 14:09:57 To: OSM - Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Has someone just given us

[Talk-gb-london] Exit numbers of Bank station

Dear all, I noticed today that the exit numbers at Bank station are "wrong" (the map said I needed to take exit H, but this is labelled exit 1 at the station itself). Having looked at the changelog for the exit, I see they were changed as per [1]. Given that the changes were sponsored by TFL I

Re: [Talk-GB] House of Fraser

On Sat, 9 Jun 2018, 01:57 Andrew Black, wrote: > If you are going to do it use fixmes, much more likely to get noticed than > notes IMHO. > >> >> Apologies. Might be better stated as "there are advantages both ways". Round me there are LOADS of unresolved notes. So

Re: [Talk-GB] House of Fraser

If you are going to do it use fixmes, much more likely to get noticed than notes IMHO. On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 21:31 Michael Booth, wrote: > If you are going to do it use the notes feature, much more likely to get > noticed than fixmes. > > On 07/06/2018 20:53, Andrew Hain wrot

[Talk-GB] House of Fraser

House of Fraser today announced today that half their branches are to close, listing which ones. Although shops should not yet be removed does it make sense with this announcement (or others like it in the future) to put notes or fixmes in the 31 locations involved? -- Andrew

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

And some with an apostrophe: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=Lloyd+TSB#values -- Andrew From: Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> Sent: 08 May 2018 00:19:36 To: Brian Prangle Cc: Talk-GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us >Lloyds and T

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On Sat, 5 May 2018, 12:00 Rob Nickerson, wrote: > And for the balance: I disagree with Frederik on this one. > A crap map could also put people off - "why bother, OSM is so far behind, > I'll contribute to/just use Google maps instead" > > I think i agree with this.

[Talk-GB] Dentist with name of person

If a dental practice has the name of the dentist in large letters on the fascia (rather than any other name) does that count as a business name to be mapped or personal information to be kept private? -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB

[Talk-GB] Addressing of flats: review best practice

a bit clunky (Humanitarian doesn’t label anything at all). Before I discuss this with the map renderers, am I doing the best thing for tagging? -- Andrew [https://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-cde84d7490f0863c7a0b0d0a420834ebd467c1214318167d0f9a39f25a44d6bd.png]<ht

[Talk-GB] Post offices where different services open for different times

for a shorter time (which I tagged opening_hours:post_office) with some (unspecified) services available for the same opening times as the shop. The POL list [http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postoffice/branch/134810] gives the longer opening times. Any comments on how it should be mapped? -- Andrew

[Talk-GB] Post offices that have closed

What is a suitable way to identify post offices no longer in use such as http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postoffice/branch/19408 to the maintenance tools? -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Petrol stations again

Are the changes to names specifically being discussed? -- Andrew From: Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> Sent: 09 March 2018 07:46 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Petrol stations again Different area naturally, but at least here the

Re: [Talk-GB] New Post Office Data and Comparison Tool

Best not to use the type key for anything other than relation types (such as type=multipolygon). -- Andrew From: Mark Goodge <m...@good-stuff.co.uk> Sent: 19 February 2018 15:33:10 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] New Post Offic

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS info when pub has been taken over.

My experience has been that although a missing FHRS entry is a useful warning of what to resurvey, there are too many false positives to remove businesses without checking on the ground. -- Andrew From: Gregrs <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> Sent: 21 January 2018

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS info when pub has been taken over.

Thanks everyone The pub I was looking at has a FHRS reference under its new name as "awaiting inspection". This is useful confirmation that its old inspection is not valid. On 21 January 2018 at 15:58, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think it has been

[Talk-GB] FHRS info when pub has been taken over.

If a pub has been taken over by a chain (and changed name), should one delete FHRS info. My gut feeling is yes but. ... ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] BT phoneboxes

Do we know what a proportion are going to be left. Is it going to be close to none. On 3 Jan 2018 17:49, "Brian Prangle" wrote: > Happy New Year everyone > > BT are planning to remove thousands of phoneboxes, many of which we will > have mapped.I understand that for every

Re: [Talk-GB] NatWest / RBS Branch closures

Are there quality assurance tools that flag out of date names like Lloyds TSB? -- Andrew From: Paul Berry <pmberry2...@gmail.com> Sent: 01 December 2017 13:18:33 To: co...@thespillers.org.uk Cc: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] NatWest / RBS

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

On 17 Nov 2017 04:14, "Andrew Black" <andrewdbl...@googlemail.com> wrote: " I believe we need to be very clear about the licencing. All we have is Ilya's word (and I don't dispute it but it is hardly verifiable) that Shell has instructed a third party to map its petro

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

or the Channel Islands. -- Andrew From: Chris Hill <o...@raggedred.net> Sent: 03 November 2017 19:10:27 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations On 03/11/2017 18:45, David Woolley wrote: > On 03/11/17 17:51, Il

[Talk-GB] The OSM UK map - signed walking routes

My request. Signed walking routes such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6084014 Can i ask about context. Are we talking abou a layer or a website that could potentially have optional overlays. If the latter could routes be such an overlay. I appreciate they ate not everyones taste. >

Re: [Talk-GB] overpass query involving pubs

I am confused by this. I understood ( x; y; ); to be the union of x and y. Rather than x passing its results onto y. What am i missing. On 25 Oct 2017 11:58, "Roland Olbricht" wrote: While i'm here, can anyone tell me why http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/szG does > not

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Addresses and Postcodes

Are you saying that anything with a postcode beginning with SW should be tagged addr:city=London and anything beginning with TW9 or TW10 should be tagged addr:city=Richmond? -- Andrew From: Adam Snape <adam.c.sn...@gmail.com> Sent: 19 October 2017 09

Re: [Talk-GB] "an extraordinary quirk in the UK address system"

Anyone up to filling in http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/53.5308/-2.3532 then? -- Andrew From: Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> Sent: 12 September 2017 22:22:35 To: OSM GB mailing list Subject: [Talk-GB] "an extraordinary quirk in the

Re: [Talk-GB] Are Northern Ireland, Wales & England 'states'?

Should we go a bit further and strip out all is_in tags not used by Nominatim across Britain (which may mean all of them), or are there other uses we should consider? The community in France did that when they finished mapping communes. -- Andrew From: Dave F

[Talk-GB] Building that have been replaced

What should one do if there are building that have been knocked down and rebuilt. Loathe just to delete them because an armchair mapper will come back and add them back. The new building is not in current bing imagary. I have added a note #1077006 I am loathe to take photos or roam with a GPS in

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project Summer 2017 July-Sept

a video. -- Andrew From: Brian Prangle <bpran...@gmail.com> Sent: 10 July 2017 12:51 To: Talk GB Subject: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project Summer 2017 July-Sept Hi everyone This will be to improve bus route relations and station entrances, by popular vote on OSMUK Loomio channel. Bus route rel

Re: [Talk-GB] Shared Public Rights of Way

You can add route relations for each number, that way you can search for the real prow_ref, not hidden between semicolons. -- Andrew From: Bob Hawkins <bobhawk...@waitrose.com> Sent: 04 July 2017 12:05:25 To: Ed Loach; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re:

Re: [Talk-GB] Museums in Berwick-upon-Tweed

What is the easiest way to locate national grid references on the map? We could then put notes on the map if there is no-one to check. -- Andrew From: Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> Sent: 28 May 2017 10:24:19 To: OSM GB mailing list Subject: [T

Re: [Talk-GB] Proposed Import of UK Shell Filling Stations

Is it actually better to use the website as a unique identifier instead of a magic number? That way you can check the information online and tools such as Keepright will alert you if the web page disappears. -- Andrew From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists

Re: [Talk-GB] [Imports] Importing fuel stations in UK and future similar imports

> the "fair use" clause. Which specific legislation are you referring to. On 12 May 2017 17:10, "Ilya Zverev" wrote: > Hi everyone, > > First, I was amazed at the response. Thanks for constructive feedback, > which I answer below, and no thanks for toxic responses, including

Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-london] New OSM London Meetup - Invite

Does it include stations belonging to Network Rail? -- Andrew From: Stuart Reynolds <stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk> Sent: 08 May 2017 23:44:56 To: Derick Rethans Cc: Bjoern Hassler; talk-gb-lon...@openstreetmap.org; osm-gb Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-

Re: [Talk-GB] Large swaths of "heath" in Wales?

According to http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871 edits in Brazil, Russia, the United Arab Emirates and Senegal have also attracted criticism from locally knowledgeable mappers, looking like someone who is at best out of their depth. -- Andrew

Re: [Talk-GB] Named landuse polygons

OSM is influenced by the maps its contributors see and are used to. In Britain that includes names of isolated farms on Ordnance Survey maps. -- Andrew From: Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> Sent: 17 January 2017 23:00:37 To: talk-gb@openstreetm

[Talk-GB] Named landuse polygons

as a local and they were added to the existing polygons, which are somewhat arbitrary (you could micromap with a polygon for each block omitting all roads). These names appear on OSM-carto in italics. What is a general view on when it makes sense to add a name to a landuse polygon? -- Andrew

[Talk-GB] OSM point of interest counts in each district as a proportion of FHRS

___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] OSM point of interest counts in each district as a proportion of FHRS

Wigan 25.07% 371 Basildon 23.95% 372 Clackmannanshire 23.84% 373 Inverclyde 22.45% 374 Doncaster 21.91% 375 Castle Point 19.71% 376 Burnley 17.98% 377 Eastbourne 16.24% -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB

Re: [Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS?

I am more interested in the possibility that the business has closed. -- Andrew From: SK53 <sk53@gmail.com> Sent: 21 December 2016 13:17:48 To: Andrew Hain Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS? Techn

[Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS?

? -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] FHRS and businesses run from home

in the FHRS data set? -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] access:psv

Is there a distinction between PSV and "local buses only". I heard a saga about a heritage bus where driver had PSV Licence in a bus lane. Can't remember details. ( Reply all this time!) On 15 Oct 2016 16:26, "Philip Barnes" wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 16:38 +,

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Talk-gb-westmidlands Digest, Vol 96, Issue 1

Hi all Is the meeting at The Bull in Price Street? Thanks Andrew > On 3 Oct 2016, at 13:00, talk-gb-westmidlands-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > Send Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list submissions to > talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe

Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-responsive mapper

Every account that has ever been blocked has a link from the profile called “Active blocks”. -- Andrew From: Paul Sladen <o...@paul.sladen.org> Sent: 17 August 2016 11:04:20 To: Will Phillips Cc: Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin bo

Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-responsive mapper

Do we know how these values are calculated, for instance do they come from an external source? -- Andrew From: Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl> Sent: 15 August 2016 08:39 To: Talk-GB Subject: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-resp

Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-responsive mapper

Just out of interest, are unincorporated areas in Australia tagged with boundary relations? -- Andrew From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Sent: 15 August 2016 12:00 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, a

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM UK site

in website (see http://iwlearn.net/news) Or like blogs.openstreetmap.org? -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] London meetup on Thursday

The next London pub meetup will be on Thursday 16th June at 7pm in the Monkey Puzzle near Paddington station (http://themonkeypuzzlepub.co.UK). Sorry for the short notice. -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https

Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project (Health): Pharmacies and Defibrillators

I notice the list of registered pharmacies includes hospital pharmacies. Not sure these are worth adding as the area should already be marked as a hospital. And i don't believe the process GP prescriptions. On 9 May 2016 7:36 p.m., "Rob Nickerson" wrote: > Nice work

Re: [Talk-GB] Open data (Was: Parliamentary debate mentions OSM)

not mapped bus routes for some time because I haven’t seen enough reward there. -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Open data (Was: Parliamentary debate mentions OSM)

d. Plus, usefully be part of a worldwide map that people can write worldwide tools for. -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM with Wikidata: now covers UK and Ireland

I still get internal errors in a few places, for instance Richmond upon Thames. -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM with Wikidata: now covers UK and Ireland

I’m getting internal server errors when I try to look at the previews. -- Andrew From: Edward Betts <edw...@4angle.com> Sent: 11 March 2016 15:46 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OSM with Wikidata: now covers UK and Ireland I've

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM with Wikidata: now covers UK and Ireland

Well done and congratulations. Building or land tags can go on multipolygons, in fact it manages cases more complicated than this one better. It does seem silly to have just one tag in a different place though. -- Andrew From: Edward Betts <

Re: [Talk-GB] route relations type=road

But surely I can see no obvious harm in the presence of the relations. Also searching the database by reference doesn’t always work, for instance not all road segments tagged A1 in the UK are part of the road from London to Edinburgh. -- Andrew From

Re: [Talk-GB] New Map Style feedback

a UK map is my choice to draw RoW markings over highway markings. For example a designated right of way on a private road is marked as a footpath and as a private road. -- Andrew. -- Andrew M. Bishop http://www.

Re: [Talk-GB] Anybody a member of CAMRA?

My concern is the quality of their location data - they suffer from the well known myth that a postcode defines the location. I have helped in a few specific cases but the local branch didn't seem interested in for example checking the locaion of pubs before uploading. This then leads to concerns

  1   2   3   >