Hi Graham,
On 15/01/2012 09:28, Graham Jones wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to find the history of the relation covering the Weardale
Way ( 86561 ). I can view the relation itself ok at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86561, but when I try to
view the history of it with
On 21/04/2011 13:42, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
David Dixon wrote:
Richard - are you prepared to humour the rest of us and give this a go?
Well, I can't stop you!
If I were someone wanting the National Byway to render right now, I'd tag it
as rcn, not ncn, because I believe if it quacks like
On 20/04/2011 13:19, monxton wrote:
The National Byway is currently tagged as :
route=bicycle
network=national_byway
name=National Byway (region name)
but the proposal being discussed here is to change to network=ncn
I started one of the older threads on the same topic, so I've been
On 08/05/2010 11:31, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
David Dixon wrote:
Apart from standardising the tagging, this would also add the Byway to
opencyclemap.
In the absence of dissent, I'll update as suggested so shout now if you
disagree!
As someone who's mapped lots of both the National Byway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Byway
Currently the National Byway cycle route (and the additional loops) are
tagged as network=National Byway while all other cycle routes are
=ncn, rcn or lcn. Are there any good reasons why the Byway shouldn't be:
name=National Byway
On 25/04/2010 07:57, Lester Caine wrote:
Just because YOU are not using the data does not entitle you to delete it!
The whole reason *I* am interested in OSM is as a base for documenting my
genealogical data. Being able to check a location at some point in time is
important and while many of
I've been playing with the OS OpenData Locator dataset, which contains
the XY coordinates for the ends midpoint of many of the UK's roads.
This gazetteer appears to complement the StreetView data - some (short)
streets whose names are absent from StreetView are included in OS
Locator.
On 10/04/2010 23:03, Gregory wrote:
Well spotted ddixon, some of those edits seem like clear he he, you can
change wikipedia to say what you like edits. There have just been some
accidental deletes in Canada and it seems like the way to deal with them
is manually.
To undelete a way, press
On 27/02/2010 17:14, Ed Loach wrote:
http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2204/697
As a PS I used the JOSM remote control plugin to download the above
relation, and wondered if I could save as OSM, tweak version number
of 697 to 703 in an editor, load the OSM back into JOSM, add a
On 27/02/2010 18:45, Dave F. wrote:
David Dixon wrote:
Have just merged the two relation versions and missed out the four
altered ways - seems to have uploaded OK. Hopefully (almost) all fixed
now!
Thanks for doing that.
Is there an easy way to find the altered ones?
Cheers
Dave F
Peter Miller wrote:
On 23 Aug 2009, at 15:52, Bogus Zaba wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 22 Aug 2009, at 12:03, Chris Hill wrote:
Well I'm pleased that they agree with me, but I'm not the oracle!
This is another source quoting the same general information. Do
the Scottish and Northern
11 matches
Mail list logo
