Hi all,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:58:28PM +0100, Simon Ritchie wrote:
Hmm. Good point. Most of the data in Ian's database is contributed by
the trigpointers - reports of visits to the trigs. Most of the data
about the actual trigs on the site (position etc) comes from the OS.
See this
Hi Jack,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 05:30:41PM +, Jack FitzSimons via Talk-GB wrote:
What if one of those sources (say FHRS) shows the correct postcode but
more obvious sources (e.g. the company website) shows an old postcode?
I can use the correct postcode but it is likely to be changed
Hi Bart,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:24:44PM +0100, BD wrote:
I have to say that I'm a bit surprised with the mailing list being
used instead of forum, which would allow for easier search and access
to the information.
If you are looking for something specific, you could always do a Google
Hi Martin,
Many thanks to whoever did this.
Here's the related pull request on Github:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3327
Thanks,
Greg
--
Twitter: @gregrs_uk
http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org
PGP key ID: 64907C8A
Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD 841E A505 3FAA D2E8
Hi Colin,
Oh and another where the fhrs listing has the wrong postcode!
Please add the wrong postcode using not:addr:postcode and add a note to
say that the FHRS postcode disagrees e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391878897. The comparison tool will
recognise this and will no longer
Hi Colin,
I know of a local business which has closed but is still listed in
gregrs tool. What can I do about it?
Thanks for your question. If the building is still unused, perhaps you
could leave the fhrs:id tag in place and add a disused: prefix (see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
Hi Rob,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 03:58:37PM +, Rob Nickerson wrote:
I don't think it has been mentioned, but having the link to FHRS is one
way of keeping on top of changes in places where we have fewer active
mappers. That is, by monitoring for changes in FHRS we can identify
closures,
Hi all,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 01:12:07PM +, Mark Goodge wrote:
If there has been a change of ownership, then yes, the old FHRS rating
doesn't carry over to the new one. So it would need to be deleted from
OSM as well.
Whilst it's great to include the fhrs:id for an establishment and
haven't checked
which is in more frequent use.) EdLoach added an issue for the FHRS/OSM
comparison tool that suggests the use of not:fhrs:id. Whilst the
functionality he describes isn't currently supported by the tool, I will
try to get round to adding it at some point: see
https://github.com/gregrs
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:15:08PM +, paulmgill...@gmail.com wrote:
If store data can be pulled from directly from a company's public
facing website ('store finder' page) is there any reason we can't do
such imports without discussion with/permission from the company
concerned?
Hi all,
Using Robert Whittaker's excellent postcode stats (available in an
interactive form here: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/stats/),
I've created a list of the FHRS establishments that have a postcode
which currently hasn't been assigned to any objects in OpenStreetMap. As
part
Dear all,
The FHRS comparison tool (http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/)
adds fixme:addr1, fixme:addr2, etc. tags when a user clicks 'Add tags in
JOSM' because it can't (yet?) figure out which parts of the address
should go into which addr: tag. The idea is that mappers should make
is still missing a large number of geocodes, I'm afraid, but
this has been a long standing issue as shown on
http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/district-334.html.
Thanks,
Greg
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:52:20PM +0100, Gregrs wrote:
Several authorities (Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor
Hi David,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:15:25PM +0100, David Woolley wrote:
Using postcode centroids is why so many self contributed business POIs
on Google Maps are almost useless for finding the business. I hope
no-one is adding POIs based on such data.
I agree. This is why the comparison
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:22:35PM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
wrote:
If you still have postcodes for those, you can look up the postcode
centroid in Code-Point Open and use that as the lat/lon instead. (In
fact, I think that's what the locations you're currently showing
Hi David,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:03:11PM +0100, David Woolley wrote:
Is it possible that they were using NPLG data, that is not open?
I'm not sure; it seems to be reverse-geocoded from postcode centroids
(which is one reason I wouldn't recommend anyone directly copying FHRS
data into
).
Feel free to report bugs or suggest improvements here:
https://github.com/gregrs-uk/fhrs-osm-stats.
Several authorities (Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor, Portsmouth
and South Tyneside) seem to have removed geocodes for a large number of
their FHRS establishments recently, as shown
Hi Lester,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:33:07PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
Bigger collage complexes may well have additional catering outlets
across multiple campuses which need separate objects for each campus,
building and potentially each identifiable outlet. It should not be a
problem
to the school boundary separated by
semicolons but I'm afraid this isn't yet supported by the comparison
tool: https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/11.
One advantage of what you're currently doing is that the clubs get
mapped as an amenity too.
Thanks,
Greg
--
Twitter: @gregrs_uk
Hi Colin,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:17:49PM +0100, Colin Spiller wrote:
Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary.
However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant building
within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs -
expects both
ostcode errors for each district. (It
>could also use the presence of such a tag to suppress/de-emphasize the
>postcode mismatch errors it reports.
Thanks for that idea, Robert. I have added an issue on GitHub
<https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/44>. I won't have
time t
t sure if that
>shows field boundaries etc?)
I made a start on a carto style for outdoor use in GB at 1:25k scale but
there is still some way to go. You're welcome to have a look, though:
https://github.com/gregrs-uk/gb-leisure-carto
If nothing else, it might give you some ideas about adding contour
y FHRS/OSM comparison tool at
<http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/> and spread the word about it
to other mappers. Please continue to report bugs or suggest features at
<https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm>. I don't always have time
to respond to these immediately, but h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
My apologies Andrew, I somehow managed to send a blank email from your
address as a result of typing something into the wrong window and
inadvertently triggering a key command!
Sorry for the unnecessary noise... Happy New Year!
Greg
- --
eld.
>
> So far I've been using "FHRS" rather than the full name expansion.
> --
> Be Seeing You - Rob.
> If at first you don't succeed,
> then skydiving isn't for you.
> From: Gregrs <gre...@fastmail.co.uk>
> Sent: 28 November 2016 22:15:23
> To: Rober
Thanks Rob. I hope you don’t mind me CC’ing the Talk-GB list.
I’ve updated the wiki page
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Food_Hygiene_Rating_System] a bit but
the recommendations for tagging are a bit out of date compared with what’s been
discussed on the list more recently. It seems
26 matches
Mail list logo
