Colin,
I've been doing some coastline updates around the South West, and have been
basing my coastline on the OS_StreetView map layer which also shows MHW.
however the GPX file does not seem to match this. In Cornwall, which has a
very jagged coast, you can never rely on Bing as the angles
HI,
Yes, I removed this as I felt that it was incorrect and did not reflect the
conditions on the ground. It was specifically removed under one change back
in September 2016, whilst I was working on addressing some of the other mapping
errors around that area. The Change was
Looks like there has been an issue with changeset 30821940 Which seems to
have added the A30 through the whole of Cornwall on an incorrect route.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30821940
Didn’t want to back this change out myself, as not sure what else it changed.
Any thoughts or
-map
Thanks
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Paul Sladen
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:44 AM
To: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Issue with Changeset
On Fri, 15 May 2015, Jason Woollacott wrote:
Looks like there has been an issue with changeset 30821940 Which
seems to have added the A30
Interestingly, Google show it on their map.
Jason (UniEagle)
From: Andy Robinson
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 4:00 PM
To: 'Richard Symonds' ; 'Andy Mabbett'
Cc: mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] A431 toll road
Councils are hog tied by over zealous legislation (and in
Hi Bernard,
Welcome to the GB Mailing List.
I believe the simple answer is yes.
There is a wiki page which you may have already found which lists which
councils have released data which we can use. Norfolk is on that list.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_local_councils
That links to a
All Copyright info seems to be recorded on this page
http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/historicalmapsterms
And the only reference to Aerial Photography is copyrighted to © Get Mapping
2000 / © GeoPerspectives 2006.
I've found a reference to OGL under
http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/disclaimer
Hi Wintonian,
As long as you use the shapefile or KML and manipulate the data itself,
then there wont be a problem.
However, the Hants online map uses OS data which is crown copyright, and has
data which has not been released under OpenData, so you can't use copy the
data from that.
Jason
And then we end up with disputes over what areas you are and are not permitted
to enter. Broken Lines, and you are permitted to enter if safe, solid
lines, only permitted to enter in an emergency. Both of which technically
allow you to do a u turn, in the event that a incident dictates
+1 from me.
Jason (UniEagle)
From: Tom Chance
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 1:05 PM
To: SomeoneElse
Cc: talk-gb OSM List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple
ways when road is not divided
I have always operated on the assumption that you only split
It renders fine at all levels when I look at it on the standard map,
however on the french map the gap is still there.
http://layers.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=11lat=50.61909lon=-3.80439layers=B
It maybe a planet replicating problem, as zooming in on the .fr map also
Hi Stephen,
Just wondering what sources you have for this data. I noted that the
document you based the original
proposal,(http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/15462826) is
copyrighted by a company, has it been released under a suitable license?
I understand that Parish
Thinking about how to code them, maybe boundary=civil would be acceptable.
Somebody could probably form an argument for boundary=Administrative, as
they do have an admin function, but they would need to be different from
the Civil Parish.
Jason (UniEagle)
-Original Message-
Hi Jason,
Think I’ve managed to fix the problem.
Looks like a user had split the heath area, and then added a stream tag to
part of it. This stream was actually sat on top of another stream when I
separated them.
Will need to check when the Map updates, might need a little bit of a
Agreed, this sounds like it's an ideal candidate to be made available as a
supplementary data source, like Bing, or the OpenData layers. Which can
then be manually transposed by map editors or used to confirm existing data.
I'll add my thoughts to the site.
Jason W (UniEagle)
This relates to some work I did on the Cornish county boundary a while back,
the same also has happened at Newton Ferrers, just south of Plymouth.
Whilst remapping the boundary, I also pushed the coastline further up the
channel.The new boundary has rendered, and the removal of the
, but it seems very odd just to draw it across
at Dittisham.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Peat
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:48 AM
To: Jason Woollacott
Cc: talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Fowey estuary coastline problem
Hi Jason,
On 30 January 2013 08:00, Jason
be two lines in OSM, right?
Colin
On 2013-01-30 11:46, Jason Woollacott wrote:
I wish I knew the reasoning behind it... I can understand the boundary
being at the low water mark, but it seems very odd just to draw it across
at Dittisham.
Jason
Thanks Richard,
Thats good to hear, I'd managed to tidy up a lot of the A roads, but we would
have lost a lot of residential roads, and other local knowledge.
Jason (UniEagle)
From: rb...@cantab.net
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:58:40 +
Subject: Re:
I've been working on the Wirral and Liverpool. Making some progress there.
Jason
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:20:00 +
From: rich...@systemed.net
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Remapping update
We're now down to 900 problematic trunk/primary/motorway:
20 matches
Mail list logo
