On 1 August 2014 11:17, Stuart Reynolds stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk
wrote:
In terms of bus routes, we also compute the most likely route between
stops, and could use that to update the services on each link. But that is
a whole different ball game - we have to make sure our data is good
path along a back street
rather than down the main road.
Cheers
Stuart
*From:* Oliver Jowett [mailto:oliver.jow...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 01 August 2014 1:51 PM
*To:* Stuart Reynolds
*Cc:* Talk GB
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] NaPTAN (stop) import
On 1 August 2014 11:17, Stuart Reynolds stu
On 1 December 2013 19:03, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
For most users, you just need to log-in and tick the always stay logged
in button and the welcome box will go. As an often requested feature I am
sure that someone will write the required code to add a close button (or my
On 1 December 2013 20:19, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 01.12.2013 21:00, Oliver Jowett wrote:
What's the workaround for users that do not wish to retain cookies?
GreaseMonkey could be an option.
The barrier to entry in setting that up is a bit high for me unfortunately
On 1 December 2013 20:46, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 01.12.2013 21:32, Oliver Jowett wrote:
The barrier to entry in setting that up is a bit high for me
unfortunately (unless you have a script already prepared?)
This'll do:
Works like a charm! Thanks :)
Oliver
On 17 November 2013 00:10, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
The point is that just using the map is not our target audience.
As has been said many times, we are not trying to be an end user mapping
site that offers a Google Maps alternative for the masses.
Our target audience is people
On 17 November 2013 15:06, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
To use the map I'd prefer not to have that signup box floating around all
the time (I am only logged in when I am about to edit).
Oliver
You could tick the stay logged in button,
I don't retain cookies between
On 17 November 2013 21:42, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
p.s. This redesign is a proposal from John of the MapBox team. It will
ultimately be accepted or rejected by the OSM Foundation/working groups.
Anyone can propose changes, so if you have the coding skills to make this
On 14 October 2013 13:24, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
The note is great for humans, but won't be able to be interpreted by
routing algorithms. Using the Conditional Restrictions from
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions , I'd
On 16 September 2013 11:49, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 16/09/2013 10:08, Oliver Jowett wrote:
It does render differently (I know, don't tag for the renderer, but it
seems reasonable for a renderer to infer the primary use from the
highway tag)
Indeed, but it's
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.comwrote:
- no delimiter (+442079460676)
- misplaced delimiter (+44 207 946 0676)
Aren't these unambiguous already?
Oliver
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:01 AM, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 August 2013 08:43, Oliver Jowett oliver.jow...@gmail.com wrote:
- no delimiter (+442079460676)
- misplaced delimiter (+44 207 946 0676)
Aren't these unambiguous already?
They breach the existing
I did something similar to this junction:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSYTukM-- / http://binged.it/16jtNsx (note that the
most detailed aerial photo is quite old and predates the guided busway -
zoom out for more recent imagery)
primarily to get routing right. The current version reflects some
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
On 09/05/2013 13:30, Oliver Jowett wrote:
If there's a better way to represent this while keeping enough
information to be able to route sensibly, how should it be done?
You can set up turn restrictions
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.ukwrote:
First of all - thanks for all the replies. I've added a link to this
thread to the map note.
David Earl wrote:
What do people think of this:
http://osm.org/go/0EQSJEoZT-- (aerial: http://binged.it/10kuDNm )
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 18/04/13 14:14, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013, at 13:01, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 18/04/2013 12:52, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Updates are a lot harder to do as you have to deal with differences
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1]
That seems to boil down to don't modify naptan: tags except
naptan:verified, so hopefully we won't have to worry about conflicts
between import updates and manual changes there.
Not
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 18/04/13 18:12, Oliver Jowett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net mailto:
o...@raggedred.net wrote:
I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1]
That seems to boil down to don't
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.comwrote:
Or perhaps a comparison between the old and new NaPTAN data would be
better?
Do we have the old data around? (I'm not clear whether all the original
imports were from one dataset, or several over time)
Oliver
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
And does anyone know how widespread such Auto_OS_OpenData_StreetView
damage is around the country? Taginfo suggests there's 45 598
cases - hopefully not all this bad?
Hi
Has anyone looked at using TNDS (http://traveline.info/tnds.html) as a
basis for importing bus routes into OSM? I've had a quick look at the data
and it looks like it would be possible to extract at least the stop
ordering for each route. In theory it can also have the road routes between
21 matches
Mail list logo
