On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 10:40 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>
> We want to update data from the import in the future, so this kind of
> id is ok.
That type of data cannot be relied upon for maintenance. As others have
said these 'meaningless' tags will be removed by mappers. Objects will
be copied
On 13/05/17 10:48, David Woolley wrote:
Also, maps are covered by database rights as well as copyright, for 15
years, and that is the real issue for geocoding, as it doesn't require
any degree of creativity.
I should have added that the fair dealing exemption for database rights
explicitly
On 13/05/17 08:08, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
There is no "fair use" clause in UK copyright law, which is important not
just because OSM is hosted in England & Wales but also because this is
presumably a dataset in part containing materials with an E copyright
holder.
Also, maps are covered by
Thanks, Richard. The dataset in question definitely was not geocoded,
but I will inform Navads about possible issues with geocoded datasets.
Ilya
13.05.2017 10:08, Richard Fairhurst пишет:
Ilya Zverev wrote:
I think that would fall into the "fair use" clause.
There is no "fair use" clause
Ilya Zverev wrote:
> I think that would fall into the "fair use" clause.
There is no "fair use" clause in UK copyright law, which is important not
just because OSM is hosted in England & Wales but also because this is
presumably a dataset in part containing materials with an E copyright
holder.
> the "fair use" clause.
Which specific legislation are you referring to.
On 12 May 2017 17:10, "Ilya Zverev" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> First, I was amazed at the response. Thanks for constructive feedback,
> which I answer below, and no thanks for toxic responses, including
A few issues I have spotted with the proposed data,
Website: This should only be included if it refers to the actual object
and should not be set to the shell.co.uk site.
I have spotted some really silly street names, such as
addr:street=A46/A6 A46/A6 Trunk Road.
A filling station is often part
On 12 May 2017 at 17:08, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> I am not sure if I should add the brand:wikidata=Q154950 tag, and for now
> decided against that.
I would encourage you to include this.
> * "The general view seems to be against IDs like this": what has happened
> with the
Hi everyone,
First, I was amazed at the response. Thanks for constructive feedback, which I
answer below, and no thanks for toxic responses, including asking for money
(what money? We — as in maps.me — get none out of this) and imposing impossible
restrictions (manually investigate context for
9 matches
Mail list logo