Re: [Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] Coordinates in OSM. Really annoying

2017-04-22 Thread SK53
Hi Dan, Yes I think it started on talk and has popped up here quite late on in the discussion. Jerry On 22 April 2017 at 20:01, Dan S wrote: > Hi > > Did I miss some emails, or did someone redirect this thread to a > different mailing list half-way through? I don't

Re: [Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] Coordinates in OSM. Really annoying

2017-04-22 Thread Dave F
Apologies Dan Someone replied direct to me, I then typed wrong address when replying to the list. As you probably worked out, the previous posts are in OSM-Talk DaveF On 22/04/2017 20:01, Dan S wrote: Hi Did I miss some emails, or did someone redirect this thread to a different mailing

Re: [Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] Coordinates in OSM. Really annoying

2017-04-22 Thread Dan S
Hi Did I miss some emails, or did someone redirect this thread to a different mailing list half-way through? I don't see what the latter would be for, in this case, so I'm wondering if I'm losing emails...! Thanks Dan 2017-04-22 16:23 GMT+01:00 Dave F : > In this

Re: [Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] Coordinates in OSM. Really annoying

2017-04-22 Thread Lester Caine
Looks like I fell fowl of another annoying 'standard' ... just how replies to an email list are handled! If only people would use the same standard everywhere ;) On 22/04/17 16:23, Dave F wrote: > In this context I'm unsure what you mean by "interface standards" Working from the bottom ...

Re: [Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] Coordinates in OSM. Really annoying

2017-04-22 Thread Dave F
In this context I'm unsure what you mean by "interface standards" On 22/04/2017 15:45, Lester Caine wrote: On 22/04/17 15:28, Dave F wrote: As they're parameters, the format can be standardised for the end user & any programme should be able to sort out syntax behind the scenes. Totally agree