Echoing Jerry's previous plea - please comment on the Google docs AoA-
there has been a fresh definition of OpenStreetMap there for several days
Regards
Brian
On 22 March 2016 at 21:32, Tim Waters wrote:
> Frederik is correct in saying that OpenStreetMap Project does not
Frederik is correct in saying that OpenStreetMap Project does not
appear in the OSMF Articles of Association.
However, on the OSMF website, the following words are used: "The
Foundation supports the OpenStreetMap Project."
So the wider OSM "thing" is the OpenStreetMap Project rather than the
On 20/03/16 19:25, Amaroussi (OpenStreetMap) wrote:
The most simplest phrase I can think of that isn’t as flippant as the
Thameslink Programme would be “an open-access cartography service”.
The service is not the main part of the operation. That is provided by
the map database. The
Hi,
The most simplest phrase I can think of that isn’t as flippant as the
Thameslink Programme would be “an open-access cartography service”.
— Amaroussi.
> On 20 Mar 2016, at 18:44, Gregory wrote:
>
> This isn't a description/blurb for the website/marketing.
>
Hi,
On 03/20/2016 06:36 PM, Gregory wrote:
> Included in the meeting on Thursday[1] was discussion on the definition
> of "OpenStreetMap" in the AoA.
It might be interesting to consider - unless you've done that already -
that the OSMF itself is *not* limited to supporting OpenStreetMap; in
fact
This isn't a description/blurb for the website/marketing.
This is for the AoA which is a legal document and needs to state what it
means when it refers to "OpenStreetMap". Reading the document (or searching
it for "OpenStreetMap") will help you understand the relevance. As Jerry
said on the call,
Dang, wrong sender email and wrong destination email again!
Maybe try:
“A free map service where users don’t need to pay elephant-sized fees to reuse
the data.”
or
“Maps without borders, literally.”
—Amaroussi
> On 20 Mar 2016, at 17:36, Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi
7 matches
Mail list logo