Re: [Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even

Just to add my opinion on this, I would also agree with Jerry that addr:interpolation on a node/building with an addr:housenumber=1-5 would seem an obvious and logical way. To reply to Mateusz, I think the situation in the UK may be different, as they note. There are several addresses I am aware

Re: [Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even

Dec 10, 2020, 21:51 by sk53@gmail.com: > However, I would regard > the Dutch > > & Polish > communities approach of adding individual > nodes for each address in the building irrespective of the actual address > position outline

Re: [Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even

addr:interpolation used on single buildings has certainly been our standard practice in the East Midlands for 9 or 10 years now. It's now often used in conjunction with addr:flats or addr:unit, but also with addr:housenumber, which I think was the first usage. It was obvious early on that multiple

Re: [Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even

That JOSM rendering is just a limitation in JOSM's rendering - I'd imagine it was unplanned. I'd be happy to see that second solution (i.e. make clear the interpretation of the tag, for closed ways). I don't necessarily think it needs a proposal/vote but I'd be happy to see it happen! Best Dan

[Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even

Date: 10 Dec 2020, 18:34 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: mattatt...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] House number ranges that are only odd or even > This issue also came to my mind. addr:interpolation on a building doesn't > seem appropriate. JOSM, for example, renders it as a dotted line