Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

2012-03-23 Thread Lennard
On 23-3-2012 3:55, mick wrote: A relation tagged as a motorway will render as such. What would then happen is that the tunnel way is actually rendered, but then the non-tunnel motorway relation is rendered on top of that. Perhaps its time to review the rendering, many motorways have sections

Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

2012-03-23 Thread mick
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 20:42:07 +0100 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 23-3-2012 3:55, mick wrote: A relation tagged as a motorway will render as such. What would then happen is that the tunnel way is actually rendered, but then the non-tunnel motorway relation is rendered on top of that.

Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

2012-03-23 Thread Lennard
On 24-3-2012 1:00, mick wrote: The rendering of 'tunnel' should over-ride 'motorway' showing that the motorway passes through a tunnel. And so it does. But then someone creates a relation, tags it as non-tunneled motorway as well, adds a whole bunch of motorway ways including tunneled

Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

2012-03-23 Thread mick
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:07:06 +0100 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 24-3-2012 1:00, mick wrote: The rendering of 'tunnel' should over-ride 'motorway' showing that the motorway passes through a tunnel. And so it does. But then someone creates a relation, tags it as non-tunneled

Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

2012-03-22 Thread Nick Austin
Ollie, I've removed highway=motorway from inside relation 103623. This appears to fix the problem but I've no idea why. Nick. On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Nick Austin nick.w.aus...@gmail.com wrote: I reckon It's the inclusion of the A1(M) relation (103623) I've remove it from one of the

Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

2012-03-22 Thread mick
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:18:10 +0100 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 22-3-2012 10:02, Nick Austin wrote: I've removed highway=motorway from inside relation 103623. This appears to fix the problem but I've no idea why. A relation tagged as a motorway will render as such. What would then

[Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

2012-03-21 Thread Oliver O'Brien
Dear all Does anyone know why the Hatfield Tunnel: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.76493lon=-0.23691zoom=16layers=M …is not rendering as a tunnel on the standard osm.xml Mapnik render? It's osm_id 147479059 I've checked and it had the tunnel=yes tag. As far as I can see other tunnels are

Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

2012-03-21 Thread Nick Austin
I reckon It's the inclusion of the A1(M) relation (103623) I've remove it from one of the carriageways and it seems to render properly now. You just need to identify what it is about that relation that is overriding the tunnel tag.. Nick. On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Oliver O'Brien