On 15/01/2019 12:00, Martin Wynne wrote:
Given that they are part of the public highway, it's puzzling why the
Environment Agency feels the need to compulsorily acquire the rights to
pass and repass over them? And what about the rest of us? Is it usual
for small areas of tarmac in the public
Is the complication anything to do with the history of the Severn Valley
Plotlands (not sure if this is its title)? From the names of the chalets on
the compulsory purchase order map we're in (or close to) that territory I
think.
All seems rather fishy to me Martin ;-)
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Martin Wynne [mailto:mar...@templot.com]
Sent: 14 January 2019 13:23
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Property extents
> I've yet to see a Land Registry title plan go to the centrel
I've yet to see a Land Registry title plan go to the centreline of the road. I
guess it might occasionally for an unadopted highway but typically the boundary
between highway and private property is either at the back of the pavement or
some distance beyond that (verge) depending on
-Original Message-
From: David Woolley [mailto:for...@david-woolley.me.uk]
> Boundaries of properties fronted on roads technically extend to the
>middle of the road, at least for residential roads, and I have never see
>those marked.
I've yet to see a Land Registry title plan go to
I've added a "citation needed".
AFAIK it may only become apparent when you try to sell your house. It is
one of the checks that is made by a conveyancer. It depends how strongly
they like to apply the rules. One of those things that could slow down a
house purchase.but you are quite right
On 14/01/2019 09:03, Jez Nicholson wrote:
I have summarised this discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Property_extents_in_the_United_Kingdom
"A property owner is legally required to maintain property boundaries
such as fences. This is intended to minimise disputes. So, being
I have summarised this discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Property_extents_in_the_United_Kingdom
Please feel free to add more facts and references.
Regards,
Jez
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 09:03 Jez Nicholson wrote:
> I have summarised this discussion at
>
I have summarised this discussion at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Property_extents_in_the_United_Kingdom
Please feel free to add more facts and references.
Regards,
Jez
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 12:51 SK53 wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 11:39, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>>
>>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 11:39, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> snip
>
> because they're more likely to get shot on private land. Hope this is
> not so much of a concern in the UK ;)
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
>
Only if one is a raptor: https://raptorpersecutionscotland.wordpress.com/
Jerry
Hi,
On 10.01.19 01:18, Warin wrote:
> Even if it were open .. does OSM want it?
Parcel boundaries have generally been undesirable in OSM in the past,
mostly because to a lack of on-the-ground verifiability. The advice has
always been: If there's a fence, map the fence, not the boundary. If
On 10/01/2019 00:18, Warin wrote:
Even if it were open .. does OSM want it?
I don't see any specific tags for it?
landuse=residential combined with addr:*
It is something I would definitely want included if it were possible to
capture the data. The main reason it is rare at the moment is
I think in both France & Spain the cadastral information has been used
largely for mapping buildings and not land-parcels.
In places I know the French cadastral parcel data is difficult to
interpret: overlapping parcels; individual buildings as multiple parcels;
parcel boundaries not according to
Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 00:19 schreef Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> Even if it were open .. does OSM want it?
Is it equivalent to the "cadastral" data that's been used in France and Spain?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cadastre
Their experience could be informative, about what the data
ap.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Property extents
Here's one of Jerry's blog posts about the not-so-open Land Registry data:
https://sk53-osm.blogspot.com/2013/10/not-very-inspired-land-registry-open.html
and my post about testing using them:
https://chris-osm.blogspot.com/2013/10/lan
:* Re: [Talk-GB] Property extents
Here's one of Jerry's blog posts about the not-so-open Land Registry data:
https://sk53-osm.blogspot.com/2013/10/not-very-inspired-land-registry-open.html
and my post about testing using them:
https://chris-osm.blogspot.com/2013/10/land-registry-inspire
Tom, Jerry, Chris thanks for the very helpful prompts.
Cheers
Andy
From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
Sent: 09 January 2019 12:37
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Property extents
Here's one of Jerry's blog posts about the not-so-open Land Registry data
Andy Robinson [mailto:ajrli...@gmail.com
<mailto:ajrli...@gmail.com>]
Sent: 09 January 2019 10:56
To: 'David Woolley'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
<mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Property extents
On Wed 09/01/2019 10:35 David Woolley wrote:
format.
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Robinson [mailto:ajrli...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 09 January 2019 10:56
> To: 'David Woolley'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Property extents
>
> On Wed 09/01/2019 10:35 David Woolley
x polygons?
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/download-inspire-index-polygons
Data is in GML format.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andy Robinson [mailto:ajrli...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 January 2019 10:56
To: 'David Woolley'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Proper
2019 10:56
To: 'David Woolley'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Property extents
On Wed 09/01/2019 10:35 David Woolley wrote:
>Actually, that seems more valuable to OSM than the building
>outlines as it is much more difficult to accurately recover from
>aerial imagery a
On Wed 09/01/2019 10:35 David Woolley wrote:
>Actually, that seems more valuable to OSM than the building
>outlines as it is much more difficult to accurately recover from
>aerial imagery and ground surveys can normally only see front yards.
Agreed, though I wonder whether this will have any
On 09/01/2019 09:36, Rob Nickerson wrote:
It is the land area (e.g. garden boundary of a detached house) rather
than the building outline. They deem the building outline to have too
high a commercial value under their current funding mechanism.
Actually, that seems more valuable to OSM than
Hi all,
You may recall that the geospatial commission & ordnance survey have
announced that they will be releasing "property extents". By chance I found
myself in a meeting room with both organisations so I asked what "property
extents" means. It is the land area (e.g. garden boundary of a
24 matches
Mail list logo
