On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
2) Why the need for even one? After all, the ref tag on all the
component parts of the A1 should identify them without the need for a
relation.
True. A relation should only be needed if a stretch of road is shared by
-Original Message-
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Sent: 2 June 2011 00:56
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Road route relations in the UK
When looking at a bit of the A1:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34158443
I happened to notice
SomeoneElse lists@... writes:
2) Why the need for even one? After all, the ref tag on all the
component parts of the A1 should identify them without the need for a
relation.
There is of course the complication that parts of the A1 are numbered A1(M).
--
Andrew
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:29 +0100, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
2) Why the need for even one? After all, the ref tag on all the
component parts of the A1 should identify them without the need for a
relation.
True. A
When looking at a bit of the A1:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34158443
I happened to notice that it seems to belong to 6 route relations.
There's a bus route, an E road (both of which make sense) and 4 A1s
(which don't), one of which (103597) seems to have a lot more versions
than
Hi,
SomeoneElse wrote:
1) Why the need for 4 A1 route relations?
I'll leave that to others, but
2) Why the need for even one? After all, the ref tag on all the
component parts of the A1 should identify them without the need for a
relation.
True. A relation should only be needed if a
6 matches
Mail list logo
