Re: [Talk-GB] amenity=schools vs amenity=kindergarten

2016-02-18 Thread Lester Caine
On 18/02/16 10:02, Stuart Reynolds wrote: > I would stick with school. In Southend we have a number of primary schools > with nursery units, called "XYZ Primary School & Nursery". Those would > clearly be schools, and it makes no sense to have an artificial separation > for others. Yep ...

Re: [Talk-GB] amenity=schools vs amenity=kindergarten

2016-02-18 Thread Stuart Reynolds
I would stick with school. In Southend we have a number of primary schools with nursery units, called "XYZ Primary School & Nursery". Those would clearly be schools, and it makes no sense to have an artificial separation for others. Regards Stuart Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Feb 2016, at

Re: [Talk-GB] amenity=schools vs amenity=kindergarten

2016-02-17 Thread Lester Caine
On 17/02/16 19:12, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > Before anyone goes bulk changing these OSM objects to > amenity=kindergarten (which then won't be picked up by my tool when I > next update the OSM data -- as it currently only fetches > amenity=school and amenity=college objects) I thought

Re: [Talk-GB] amenity=schools vs amenity=kindergarten

2016-02-17 Thread Brian Prangle
I'd prefer that these are classed as schools as that's what they're called. Rgds Brian On 17 February 2016 at 19:12, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've just done another update to the official data in my Schools tool > at

[Talk-GB] amenity=schools vs amenity=kindergarten

2016-02-17 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
I've just done another update to the official data in my Schools tool at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/ , with the small change that I've excluded Edubase entries of type "LA Nursery School". Looking at a few examples I concluded that these were likely to be for pre-school-age children. My