http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8573585
(this might still be at the stage at which a clean reversion is possible)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
On 06/29/11 15:58, SomeoneElse wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8573585
Changeset comment Ashbourne map - plain might point to user wanting to
make a nice no-frills map for himself and not thinking about the
consequences ;)
Bye
Frederik
Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 06/29/11 15:58, SomeoneElse wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8573585
Changeset comment Ashbourne map - plain might point to user wanting to
make a nice no-frills map for himself and not thinking about the
consequences ;)
That and the fact that
On 29 June 2011 16:12, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
There was a similar case to this on the Help Centre recently:
http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/5839/map-changes-for-personal-use-is-this-right
I suggest we need to make it more obvious to first-time users that
On 29/06/2011 16:41, Peter Miller wrote:
... and tools can highlight 'changes made by new editors that you
might want to check' etc.
You're ahead of yourself on that one - it was ITO's osm mapper that
highlighted cja's edits to me! Luckily as well as the deletions they'd
added one new way
I just noticed that todays
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main ITO Analysis Summary
shows we are now over 80% for road name completion (i.e. OSM road names
compared to the OS Locator data).
I think all UK contributors should buy themselves a pint for that. Top
effort.
We
On 29 June 2011 17:37, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
I just noticed that todays
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main ITO Analysis Summary
shows we are now over 80% for road name completion (i.e. OSM road names
compared to the OS Locator data).
I think
On 29/06/2011 17:55, Peter Miller wrote:
I have also been very impressed with the initial results from the
visual comparison of OSM and OS Vector map district as well. We seem
to have an much to help the OS improve their data as the other way
round!
I'd still like to see if the OS show any
On 29 June 2011 18:02, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/06/2011 17:55, Peter Miller wrote:
I have also been very impressed with the initial results from the
visual comparison of OSM and OS Vector map district as well. We seem
to have an much to help the OS improve their data
On 29/06/11 17:37, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) wrote:
I think all UK contributors should buy themselves a pint for that. Top
effort.
Already done, but ok I'll have another!
I'd like to make a special mention for North Norfolk which was in the
bottom 10 on the ITO table just a few months ago, and
On 29 June 2011 19:25, Borbus bor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/06/11 17:37, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) wrote:
I think all UK contributors should buy themselves a pint for that. Top
effort.
Already done, but ok I'll have another!
I'd like to make a special mention for North Norfolk which was in
On 29/06/2011 15:57, Lester Caine wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 06/29/11 15:58, SomeoneElse wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8573585
Changeset comment Ashbourne map - plain might point to user wanting to
make a nice no-frills map for himself and not thinking about the
12 matches
Mail list logo
