Chatted for an hour with Chris Fleet, the senior map curator at NLS on
Friday.
He's keen to see OSM use the historical mapping they now have online. I've
created a wiki page (which Chris has contributed to) [1] that documents
those georeferenced maps that are likely to be of most use to mappers in
Andy Robinson wrote:
He's keen to see OSM use the historical mapping they now have online.
Magic and exactly what I'm looking for myself.
I have looked at second hand scanners but
availability is like hens teeth and they are generally very bulky or heavy
and often running on old SCSI
Hi,
Without wishing to descend into a license debate... (I've seen previous posts
suggesting that *importing* the postcode database is at least contentious)
Is it possible to get the osm.org search box to return results of the full
postcode database? The data's been geocoded already, and it
I believe that the royal mail postcode database is copyright and so importing
such data would probably be a no no.
Until recently I was a Ramblers Membership srcretary, and the problems caused
by postcode allocation of new members, in particular around the county boundary
led me to believe
On 9 March 2012 23:00, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
I don't want to steal Andy's thunder, but I thought I'd check the progress
and what good timing!
. My reported geometry issues are solved.
. Many more areas have been processed (~ 1/3 of DfT areas including my local
area*)
On 11 March 2012 14:23, MT_Payne trevy...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:
NCN route 20 used to be continuous on the OSM, as it is on the ground and on
Sustrans site, checked from Wandsworth to Carshalton and on to Oaks Park.
Several sections appear to be missing on OSM:
On 12 March 2012 13:37, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 March 2012 14:23, MT_Payne trevy...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:
NCN route 20 used to be continuous on the OSM, as it is on the ground and on
Sustrans site, checked from Wandsworth to Carshalton and on to Oaks Park.
Several
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/12179/166
If someone wants to try reinstating the relation, that would be
great.
Done
Ed
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
As a PS there are still some small gaps according to the JOSM
relation editor after sorting the ways, but I've not investigated
those.
Ed
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 12/03/2012 14:38, Ed Loach wrote:
As a PS there are still some small gaps according to the JOSM
relation editor after sorting the ways, but I've not investigated
those.
Ed
Thanks Andy and Ed, I just didn't have the knowledge or experience to
fix this quickly, though I'm learning! I will
On 12/03/12 11:57, Dan Avis wrote:
I'm not talking about importing them, because I understand some people
are leery of the potential copyright issues, and because it's not an on
the ground source. That's fine; I'm side-stepping that question
(hopefully!) and instead asking: Can the osm.org
Andy Allan wrote:
It's hard to see the history of such well-edited relations, since our
browsing interface will simply time out.
This should work, I think:
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=12179
___
Talk-GB mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
