I was in town today, and noted the location of Jamie Oliver's new restaurant
at the back of the Cambridge Guildhall (Wheeler Street). I uploaded it just
now. But I realise I didn't do a complete job, because the Box Office has
moved across the road, and I didn't note what it has replaced.
Steve Doerr steve.do...@blueyonder.co.uk writes:
On 23/02/2010 20:51, Ed Loach wrote:
Can I just add that it is also best to document the relation numbers
of boundaries somewhere fairly obvious on the wiki, to try and
prevent duplicate relations appearing for the same boundary.
So for
Andrew M. Bishop wrote:
One thing that might be useful for this in the UK is my recently
updated web page:
http://www.gedanken.org.uk/mapping/osm-boundaries/
I'm going to find this useful, thanks.
One thing I think might improve it is to put the Add/Remove higher up
the list so that it's
Hi
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2204
This is the cycle route that heads out of London towards Bristol on
into S. Wales.
As you can see, it appears to have (almost) completely disappeared.
I tried to view the history (703 cersions), but it errored out saying it
was taking too
WHy excluding Medway? Isn't KCC HQ in Chatham?
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
I applied to KCC for permission to use data from their Highways Gazetteer in
OSM. They have approved on the condition that the data is attributed to them.
My request and their official reply are
http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2204/697
As a PS I used the JOSM remote control plugin to download the above
relation, and wondered if I could save as OSM, tweak version number
of 697 to 703 in an editor, load the OSM back into JOSM, add a tag
note=retrieved from v697 and upload.
On 27/02/2010 17:14, Ed Loach wrote:
http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2204/697
As a PS I used the JOSM remote control plugin to download the above
relation, and wondered if I could save as OSM, tweak version number
of 697 to 703 in an editor, load the OSM back into JOSM, add a
On 27/02/2010 18:11, SteveC wrote:
WHy excluding Medway? Isn't KCC HQ in Chatham?
No, KCC HQ is in Maidstone, the County Town of Kent. Medway has been a
Unitary Authority since 1998 and as such has its own Highways department
- see http://www.medway.gov.uk/index/environment/roads.htm
I found two segments of the route in Maidenhead that had the French NCN4
relation (153521)
I've now corrected them to the English NCN4 (2204).
Mario
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there
isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be comprehensive.
I have dealt with what I think are the two most logical options, which are:
two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged
On 27/02/2010 18:45, Dave F. wrote:
David Dixon wrote:
Have just merged the two relation versions and missed out the four
altered ways - seems to have uploaded OK. Hopefully (almost) all fixed
now!
Thanks for doing that.
Is there an easy way to find the altered ones?
Cheers
Dave F.
Hi Steve
Not sure why, but your post's got mixed up in another thread. You might
want to repost so it doesn't get missed by others.
Steve Chilton wrote:
Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there
isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be
Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there
isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be comprehensive.
I have dealt with what I think are the two most logical options, which are:
two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged
Ed Loach wrote:
I use Potlatch where you get a warning. is there not a similar
procedure
in JOSM?
I think there is an issue with JOSM where if you download the
relation, then download the ways that make that relation, it isn't
aware of other relations those ways are in. That means if
14 matches
Mail list logo
