I didn't notice this until I got back, but this roundabout looks a bit wrong:
http://osm.org/go/euzhlOxF_-
The Coventry Road seems to go over one side of the roundabout and under the
other, but I'm fairly certain both are fairly level.
Perhaps someone who knows the junction could have a look?
Hi Mary,
Great you will be coming along to Kidderminster. Happy to take you over.
I'll need to take my car because of the bike (room for more on the roof too,
that's bikes of course not people! ;-) )
You popping along to the social on Thursday?
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From:
Oh, I also noted we seem to have rather a lot of tertiary roads in Hampton.
Old Station Road doesn't look to be tertiary for me.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) [mailto:ajrli...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 29 March 2010 9:49 AM
To: 'Brian Prangle'; 'Ed
Andy wrote:
It's an odd configuration. The A45 goes over the
M42 and there
are bridges for the roundabout on the north and south (over
M42) and west
(over A45) but not on the east side. On the east side the A45
is on a bridge
over the roundabout.
So the A45 goes under the roundabout at
Ed Loach [mailto:e...@loach.me.uk] wrote:
Sent: 29 March 2010 9:58 AM
To: 'Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)'; 'Brian Prangle'
Cc: Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] M42, J6
Andy wrote:
It's an odd configuration. The A45 goes over the
M42 and there
are
Hi
I am interested in the learning to assist the project.
Are there any courses, tutorials etc.
Your web information about equipment and support seem to be
aimed(rightfully) at the brummidgums.
I am a pensioner I have no transport, though I do enjoy walking around our
village area.
Any
One for devs really but I'm not on the list. Perhaps someone could pass this
on?
I've noticed that the osm.org shortlinks ending with a dash - often don't
work in emails. The dash gets missed off from the link. In my area, at
least, this seems to move the centre slightly and switch from zoom
Forwarding to dev as requested.
I think it has been noticed already, it can also break in applications such
as twitter. But is anything going to be changed?
I understand avoiding the ending character from being non-alphanumeric(not
letters or numbers) would mean a serious rewrite of how the
On 29/03/2010 10:52, Gregory wrote:
I understand avoiding the ending character from being
non-alphanumeric(not letters or numbers) would mean a serious rewrite of
how the shortlinks are made/decoded. How much longer would short links
be if all digits were alphanumeric only?
It's also allowed
On 29 March 2010 11:09, Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.ukwrote:
On 29/03/2010 10:52, Gregory wrote:
I understand avoiding the ending character from being
non-alphanumeric(not letters or numbers) would mean a serious rewrite of
how the shortlinks are made/decoded. How much
On Monday 29 March 2010, Tom Chance wrote:
If you have any particular powers over Google and Microsoft... :-)
As mentioned, I can and do use a different URL shortener for now, but it is
a UI element right there on the home page that will lead to people sending
around broken links. That can't
It's been three months since I last tried to measure road lengths on OSM
against the Department for Transport statistics, and I thought there might
be some interest in how things are progressing.
At the moment this has only been updated where I already have decent admin
boundaries from OSM.
Would replacing the hyphen by %2D cure the problem?
Steve
--
From: Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 3:04 PM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OSM shortlinks problem
On Monday 29 March 2010, Tom
Apologies for bad link - it should now work OK.
http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCoverMar2010.csv
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:22:26 +0100
Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk wrote:
Hello Andy,
to download the csv file but the link isn't working (404).
It worked for me; Temporary snafu somewhere, perhaps?
--
Regards _
/ ) The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad
Hi Peter,
Thanks for that - I can see another target now - to turn Hartlepool Blue!
How do 'Trunk' roads fit into yours (and the DfT's) scheme? Someone
changed the main road into Hartlepool to be 'Trunk' on the basis that it has
green signs, but I have never thought of it as being a significant
On 29/03/10 20:35, Graham Jones wrote:
How do 'Trunk' roads fit into yours (and the DfT's) scheme? Someone
changed the main road into Hartlepool to be 'Trunk' on the basis that it
has green signs, but I have never thought of it as being a significant
enough place to have a Trunk road,
DfT provide separate figures for trunk and primary, but I'm afraid that at
the moment I just count all trunk and primary as primary.
From: Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 29 March 2010 20:36
To: peter.r...@aligre.co.uk
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject:
On 29 March 2010 15:15, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16271
yeah, it was originally =, but changed to - to work with twitter.
given that the characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9, _, @, - and = have already
been used, what's the next best character? ~? +?
19 matches
Mail list logo
