Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot

2011-06-12 Thread Brian Prangle
So the result of all the discussion about a proposal to develop and deploy a bot which failed to get near to a consensus, let alone agreement is to develop and deploy a bot. The discussion has ignored the basic problem of not having enough mappers on the ground collecting data - so we

[Talk-GB] Landuse polygons created by TimSC: delete them?

2011-06-12 Thread Andrew
There are many landuse polygons in the London area that were created by user TimSC, who has not yet accepted the Contributor Terms. They will all be purged from the database when the licence changes if he continues not to do so. TimSC is now demanding changes to the way OSM is run with the

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse polygons created by TimSC: delete them?

2011-06-12 Thread Nick Whitelegg
I don't normally get involved in licencing stuff, but I disagree with unnecessary data destruction. While I have accepted the CTs, and to be honest don't care one way or the other about ODBL, CC, etc I would urge most strongly that this is *not* done. Tim is a decent guy and has

[Talk-GB] Filter to show only certain ways e.g. bridleways?

2011-06-12 Thread Michael Brewer
I'd find it really useful to filter what is displayed, to limit e.g. to showing only bridleways. Basically, I'm trying to plot cycleable routes through the countryside, and it would be nice to avoid distracting footpaths that I can't use anyway. So a filter which shows e.g. roads and

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot

2011-06-12 Thread Peter Miller
On 11 June 2011 14:22, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Peter Miller wrote: Fyi we are doing some investigation in ITO into adding OS VectorDistrict 'road missing' data on the OS Locator tiles or possibly onto an alternative map layer. The aim being to make tracing of roads

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot

2011-06-12 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Peter Miller wrote: ITO are probably not the best people to set up maintain simple mirrors of existing content. Are there not 100 sites where a mirror could be set up and maintained? Why is the OS site not sufficient anyway? The OS site a) offers download-only access behind an e-mail

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot

2011-06-12 Thread Peter Miller
On 12 June 2011 20:36, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Peter Miller wrote: ITO are probably not the best people to set up maintain simple mirrors of existing content. Are there not 100 sites where a mirror could be set up and maintained? Why is the OS site not sufficient anyway?

Re: [Talk-GB] Filter to show only certain ways e.g. bridleways?

2011-06-12 Thread Peter Miller
On 12 June 2011 15:41, Michael Brewer mich...@thebrewerfamily.co.uk wrote: I'd find it really useful to filter what is displayed, to limit e.g. to showing only bridleways. Basically, I'm trying to plot cycleable routes through the countryside, and it would be nice to avoid distracting

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot

2011-06-12 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Peter Miller wrote: If this is what you want then it clearly isn't a simple FTP mirror Let's not overcomplicate things. :) All that is needed is that someone a) downloads all the OS VectorMap District files b) unzips them c) places the unzipped shapefiles on an FTP server somewhere d) copies

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot

2011-06-12 Thread Craig Loftus
Steps (a) to (e) require someone with FTP space and bandwidth to spare Roughly how much bandwidth do you think would make a worth while contribution? I'm happy to donate what ever I have remaining on my current package and upgrade within reason (with ITOs help or not). Craig

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot

2011-06-12 Thread Craig Loftus
On 12 June 2011 20:53, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Steps (a) to (e) require someone with FTP space and bandwidth to spare and I don't have either, or I'd have done it by now. Can you give a rough estimate for how much bandwidth would make a worthwhile contribution? I'm happy