Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

2013-10-14 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 12 October 2013 21:00, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles and vehicles over 13'3 high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated, there is

Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

2013-10-14 Thread David Earl
On 12/10/2013 21:00, Philip Barnes wrote: I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles and vehicles over 13'3 high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated, there is are industrial units, and a

Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

2013-10-14 Thread Oliver Jowett
On 14 October 2013 13:24, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote: The note is great for humans, but won't be able to be interpreted by routing algorithms. Using the Conditional Restrictions from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions , I'd

Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

2013-10-14 Thread ael
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Brian Prangle wrote: why not just tag a node on the road where the sign is as maxweight? It's much simpler and reflects what's on the ground Apologies: I rejected your suggestion too quickly. If instead of maxweight, I use maxweight:forward = 7.5 on a

Re: [Talk-GB] ISO3166 on GB admin boundaries

2013-10-14 Thread Robert Scott
Dragging this back up... On Thursday 10 October 2013, cquest wrote: ... It's still possible to see my slightly aborted attempt at adding ONS codes to relations a few years ago - this was made more difficult by the ONS deciding to change their coding scheme (to something equally