Congratulations due to everyone! We've just passed 100,000 addresses in the
West Mids
Regards
Brian
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
\0/ congrat!
2013/10/28 Brian Prangle br...@mappa-mercia.org
Congratulations due to everyone! We've just passed 100,000 addresses in
the West Mids
Regards
Brian
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
Maybe we could use it to make an note for mapping parties, social events and
conferences too
Bob
From: Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com
To: Talk GB talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2013, 16:15
Subject: [Talk-GB] Notes feature
It seems
That should use another first world object as a calendar item so that it’s
properly supported.
Shaun
On 28 Oct 2013, at 08:28, Bob Kerr openstreetmapcraigmil...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Maybe we could use it to make an note for mapping parties, social events and
conferences too
Bob
From:
I logged a bug with iD regarding the non-visibility of some items in the
background layer menu:
https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1929#issuecomment-27236976
The issue that I actually logged is actually being addressed as part of
a different bug, but another question span out of it. Of
Hi Andy,
I would like to see as many layers as possible in iD and other editors. The
issue, in my opinion, is one of how best to present the available layers
(more on that later). So why more layers:
1). More layers = more choice and more potential sources for confirming the
presence or absence
SomeoneElse lists@... writes:
I logged a bug with iD regarding the non-visibility of some items in
the background layer
menu:https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1929#issuecomment-27236976
The issue that I actually logged is actually being addressed as part
of a different
Over the weekend I spotted that Sheffield seems to have been added twice
recently:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2510041800
and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2494466157
as both are recent edits, I presume that both were added in good faith,
possibly almost in parallel.
Is there a useful distinction between the two 1:25000 layers?
--
Andrew
At face value, no. They both show map sheets from the Ordnance Survey 1:25k
series (although the dates may differ slightly).
However if we look at the hosting of these tiles we find that one of these
is provided by the
9 matches
Mail list logo