On 4 December 2013 11:45, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Re the HCC data I have had this communication from Dan at HCC.
Hi Nick,
I have been in comms with my contact at OS and the feedback I have had is
that ODBL and OS Open Licence can work together. As long as there is
On 03/12/2013 21:36, Robert Norris wrote:
Normally I visually compare Hants KML (and indeed West Sussex) vs OSM tile
images to identify missing ROWs and then make that a basis to include in a
route for a days out walking or cycling.
This might help:
Pragmatically though is it really going to do any harm? Particularly if we are
just adding a designation tag rather than using the HCC data to identify the
course of a path?
The path could just be tagged with designation=public_footpath; source=HCC
Open Data, (c) OS, OS OpenData Licence and
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:53:15 +
Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Pragmatically though is it really going to do any harm? Particularly
if we are just adding a designation tag rather than using the HCC
data to identify the course of a path?
If you only interested in path
4 matches
Mail list logo
