On 25/09/16 21:34, Gervase Markham wrote:
> The end result is that I still can't type UK postcodes into Nominatim,
> the main OSM search engine, and depend on getting useful results back.
The maintainers of Nominatim have kindly explained what would be needed
to finally fix this:
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 324,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8173/
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM is brought to you by ...
Dear All,
We are working on creating accessibility maps of cities and trying to
involve greater masses to contribute.
As an example of this we've launched a "mini campaign" this morning - a
puzzle challenge for the wider community to collect accessibility data in
Portsmouth.
Please
On 07/10/2016 13:03, Gregory wrote:
Is the issue/bug reported to Mapnik?
The shared node problem? I don't know. Certainly not by me.
I've become increasingly reluctant to report issues like this. Not
solely to mapnik carto but all data users. But I think that's for a
separate posting.
Is the issue/bug reported to Mapnik?
>From the base of Newcastle "Monument",
Greg.
On Oct 7, 2016 12:02 PM, "Dave F" wrote:
> On 07/10/2016 11:54, Jez Nicholson wrote:
>
>> because it's the only *riverbank* section with a name?
>>
>
> Not true.
>
>
>
>
On 07/10/2016 11:54, Jez Nicholson wrote:
because it's the only *riverbank* section with a name?
Not true.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Fixed
http://osm.org/go/euwo8goAQ?m=
It appears that, for some reason, mapnik render (I think it is just this
one) gets confused when the start/end of a closed polygon shares a node
with another closed polygon. I've moved it & it now renders
Dave F.
On 07/10/2016 11:29, Ian Caldwell wrote:
because it's the only *riverbank* section with a name?the other names
come from the river lines (?)
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 at 11:29 Ian Caldwell
wrote:
>
> On 7 October 2016 at 11:03, Jez Nicholson wrote:
>
> because it's the only
On 7 October 2016 at 11:03, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> because it's the only section with a name?
The next section to the north also has a name and that is rendered.
Ian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
because it's the only section with a name?
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 at 10:57 Ian Caldwell
wrote:
> Just noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72551464 is not being
> rendered on the standard map. It has not been edited for two years and the
> adjoining
Just noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72551464 is not being
rendered on the standard map. It has not been edited for two years and the
adjoining riverbanks are being rendered. Anybody know why?
Ian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Fwiw, there is the exact same situation in Ely:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.40627/0.25878
David
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 at 19:19, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 06/10/16 18:56, Christian Ledermann wrote:
> > How to map this?
> The staring point is if you can identify
12 matches
Mail list logo