It was me that's been doing lots of tracing in the Southwest. I was just
trying to lay a framework of the roads to help with surveying others
from. I often find it easier to survey areas bounded my a number of
major roads in one go. It gave me something to do whilst the weather was
rubbish and I
Should be a bit tidier now; I've fixed the classes there. Some of what
was marked as the A26 is actually the A228. Looking at NPE it's even
marked as such on there, so I'm not sure where the erroneous A26 came
from.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Part of Nottingham also appears to have been added to the coverage. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Fairhurst
Sent: 9 January 2008 15:22
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Oxford hi-res on Yahoo
Socks on IRC has
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Phillips
Sent: 10 January 2008 12:17
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Oxford hi-res on Yahoo
On Thu, January 10, 2008 12:00 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:24:09 -
From: Gregory Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Part
Don't worry! I took a trace last year:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Gregory%20Williams/traces/27079
Gregory
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Jaggard
Sent: 29 February 2008 15:19
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re:
PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 February 2008 19:48
To: Gregory Williams; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] London to Brighton Bike Ride - registration
Gregory Williams wrote:
Sent: 29 February 2008 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk
I've just taken a look at the Canterbury tile. It looks good, although
I'd observe that there is a noticeable horizontal shift in places. Look
at Stone Street, for example (That's the B2068 Roman Road south of
Canterbury for non-locals on the list.).
Was it our email conversation the other day
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk-gb-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Williams
Sent: 30 September 2008 15:56
To: Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists); talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Cycle lane in one direction only
-Original Message
One source I am exploring is planning application listings produced by
the
local authority. Which is I think were you had headed?
I'm not sure of the legal situation with planning data, but if things
seem fine with that then you might be interested to know that the
PlanningAlerts project have
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Andy Robinson (blackadder-
lists)
Sent: 23 December 2008 09:37
To: t...@openstreetmap.org; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org; talk-gb-
westmidla...@openstreetmap.org
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Richard Fairhurst
Sent: 5 January 2009 10:48
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Sustrans long-distance routes
As of this weekend we have our first
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Nick Whitelegg
Sent: 12 January 2009 12:47
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Mapping Party this month?
Hello everyone,
Was there talk of another
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of LeedsTracker
Sent: 14 January 2009 01:38
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org; talk-gb-theno...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Locating postboxes - any photos around?
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: 21 January 2009 20:43
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Trying to upload postbox
Folks,
I've recently tried to add a postbox to the OSM.
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of David Earl
Sent: 3 April 2009 13:02
To: Richard Mann
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Possibly using highway=path for country
footpaths
Well,
All,
I just thought I'd let you all know about the charity cycle ride that
I'll be doing this summer in aid of the British Heart Foundation and all
of the associated mapping I'm planning to do for OSM as a result of it.
This Sunday I'm setting off from Canterbury to go via Dover, Land's End,
It's potentially better, but still wrong though. For a start I've come
across several cases of two postboxes with different refs that are located
side-by-side. It's a bit of a lottery whether it'll tie up the correct ref
here. Also, I've seen several instances of bad data in the Dracos set, e.g.
a
[Snip]
A couple of questions about C-roads...
Is there a consensus about how these should be treated? Given that they
are not a 'public-facing' classification (never appear on road signs or
on any map you would buy from W. H. Smith's), I'm not sure we want the
standard renderings
I should point out that I've still got some of my data from last summer's
trip to be entered. This includes bits of NCR1, RCR30 in East Anglia, and
NCR13. However, I've been very busy lately hence not really managing to get
the data entered particularly fast.
There could be quite a bit more to do
I wouldn't take PRoW refs from any source unless I was completely confident
that it's compatible with OSM's license. It sounds like your Chiltern
Society map is an annotated OS map, therefore unsuitable.
Unfortunately I think it depends upon where you live as to how well the refs
are put up on
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Nick Whitelegg
Sent: 17 March 2010 10:22
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering
I wouldn?t take PRoW refs from any source unless I
The Kent / Essex thing is simply an artefact of deriving the areas from
known points. The boundaries shown are in effect we know based upon the
surrounding points that the boundary is approximately here.
I must say that I'm surprised at how well bits of OpenStreetMap's CT and
Code-Point Open's CT
Don't worry. There are a number of three-digit national routes appearing
now. That doesn't mean that there are at least 246 national routes. It's
just that the numbers have a little significance in the scheme of things,
like they do with road numbers.
So, in short, it's NCN.
-Original
That looks much better now. It's certainly interesting to see that whole
counties, like Norfolk, appear to be sourced from OS OpenData. I know that
that isn't true, but I guess it's a just a side-effect of the last edit to
existing ways adding a source / source:name tag referencing OS, like adding
I wonder whether it may have been these ones in Norfolk:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4631482
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4631508
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4631551
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4631742
I've also found the maxspeed colouring on the graphview JOSM plugin useful
for visualising maxspeed data:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Graphview
Cheers,
Gregory
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org]
Looks great. I think an OpenLayers Permalink anchor would make it even
better.
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Andy Street
Sent: 1 November 2010 16:39
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re:
Peter,
A great service. It'll certainly help me with keeping track of where extra
details still need to be mapped.
I've noticed these small issues:
- Ferry routes appear to be highlighted in red on the Water layer, but
this doesn't match anything in the key.
applied either.
Cheers,
Gregory
From: Gregory Williams [mailto:gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk]
Sent: 18 March 2011 15:15
To: 'Peter Miller'; 'Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org'
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] new ITO Map service in beta
Peter,
A great service. It'll certainly help me
OK, ignore that. It's been pointed out to me that the wiki says tertiary
upwards.
From: Gregory Williams [mailto:gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk]
Sent: 18 March 2011 15:29
To: 'Peter Miller'; 'Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org'
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] new ITO Map service in beta
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Sam Vekemans [mailto:acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 May 2011 09:32
To: Bob Kerr
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] User Stats over 400 000
Is anyone taking a stap-shot, of month-over-month comparison of this
data?
Thanks,
Sam
if they would have data relating to on-street-parking restrictions?
Steve
On 23/05/2011 14:53, Gregory Williams wrote:
Not strictly an OSM thing, but I'd also like to see traffic count data
released by KCC too.
Gregory
From: Gregory Williams [mailto:gregory.willi
to
find the most wanted and to provide some justification (i.e. public demand)
for us requesting the data.
Btw, I found the parish data I was looking for in OS OpenData, so no need to
pester the council for that.
TimSC
[1] http://www.hackney.gov.uk/licensing.htm
On 23/05/11 16:10, Gregory
-Original Message-
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Sent: 2 June 2011 00:56
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Road route relations in the UK
When looking at a bit of the A1:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34158443
I happened to notice
I'm primarily a cyclist and interested in ensuring that our cycle coverage
is great. Whilst looking at the Bing! aerial imagery in Portsmouth recently
I spotted some cycleways and cycle lanes which we don't have in our map.
They looked like they were in fairly established areas of the city so I
know whether the 20mph blanket extended over to Gosport as well,
which is pretty much absent of any maxspeed tagging.
From: Richard Mann [mailto:richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 September 2011 10:47
To: Gregory Williams
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Portsmouth
anywhere near as much on the map.
From: Richard Mann [mailto:richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 September 2011 10:52
To: Gregory Williams
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Portsmouth cycle paths and routes
Looks like there's only partial coverage in Oxford
I've managed to complete a substantial portion of the merging of the England
Cycling data for the areas that I've put my name down for (Ashford,
Canterbury, and Swale), so I thought I'd provide some feedback on what I've
seen. Once I'm merged with these I hope to do parts of some of the other
According to this Highways Agency article there's a new section of Regional
Cycle Route 90 waiting to be mapped:
http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/pressrelease.aspx?pressreleaseid=424913
Are there any mappers in or near Brighton that fancy going out and adding it
to our coverage?
I
I usually add an item on OpenStreetBugs or a fixme tag to make sure that
there's something reminding us that we need to eventually revert the change.
If the duration of the temporary closure is clear then I also include in the
note the date that it's likely to need to be reverted, to avoid
Some routing services, such as CycleStreets, update quite a bit more
frequently. Usually every day or two. So I think it's useful to make the
changes to benefit them so long as you've made reasonable effort to make it
clear that it'll need to be undone at some point.
Gregory
-Original
From: petermille...@gmail.com [mailto:petermille...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Miller
Sent: 20 September 2012 17:23
To: Gregory Williams
Cc: Chris Hill; Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] maxspeed changes
On 20 September 2012 16:59, Gregory Williams
greg...@gregorywilliams.me.uk wrote
Richard,
It looks good and useful. On the OSM side of things it looks like you've
missed handling cycleway=opposite_lane, since a place where I had that in
the data wasn't being rendered. I have since changed this to be
cycleway:right=opposite_lane though to be more accurate.
Cheers,
I've seen contraflow cycle lanes on the left and the right side of the road
in the UK, so thought I ought to just clarify the tagging - better to be
explicit rather than ambiguous.
From: Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk]
Sent: 09 October 2012 17:35
To: Gregory Williams
Cc
Chris,
I fully agree with these points. I've done a reasonable amount of mapping in
Sittingbourne, but my mapping tends to be centred around highways rather
than landuse or buildings. I have updated some similar tagging to what you
describe on schools in the past such that the buildings are
motor_vehicle=no says that motor vehicles aren't legally allowed along the
road. That's not the case as Aidan has pointed out that these are the
blue-backed advisory signs. If going with the commonly-used tags then I
think that, whilst it's still technically not right,
motor_vehicle=destination
-Original Message-
From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
[mailto:robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 January 2013 11:23
To: talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM: prow_ref=
On 31 December 2012 16:38, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Not that
One feature that I've found that I now use quite frequently to help with the
problems associated with increasingly detailed mapping is the Filter panel
in JOSM. Now that, for example, there's lots of landuse, buildings, and
highways all in fairly close proximity I have filters to pick out, for
Yes, this is what I do. In fact the example which Chris picked out was done by
me a few years ago when I cycled through the area. I’ve tagged quite a few
bridges like this in Kent. You’ll also notice that I’ve included the operator,
operator’s phone number, bridge name, etc. on the relation too
Colin
On 2016-02-04 17:50, Gregory Williams wrote:
I did the original mapping of Deal, so I'll take a look later, when
I can get to a PC.
Gregory
Sent from my FairPhoneOn 4 Feb 2016 16:13, Andy Townsend
<ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/02/2016 15:49, Colin Smale wrote:
Actually, t
I did the original mapping of Deal, so I'll take a look later, when I can get
to a PC.
Gregory
Sent from my FairPhoneOn 4 Feb 2016 16:13, Andy Townsend
wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2016 15:49, Colin Smale wrote:
>>
>> Actually, this user has done a lot more damage, in many other
I think that most of the reduction was due to me going through the obvious
formatting issues last weekend. I used an import from the Geofabrik GB extract
into an osm2pgsql database looking at the addr:postcode and postal_code tags.
The database enabled me to easily get the appropriate OSM
I think it's Non-Civil Parish.
Sent from Mailspring
(https://link.getmailspring.com/link/1531978742.local-ca768658-9c97-v1.2.2-96fb3...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgetmailspring.com%2F=VGFsay1HQkBvcGVuc3RyZWV0bWFwLm9yZw%3D%3D),
the best free email app for work
On Jul 19 2018, at
arge number (17k+), finding hotspots in a big county is very
useful.
*
From a QA viewpoint a count of location=roof or generator:location=roof might
be useful as well. All the FIT installs are likely to be of this type.
Jerry
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:41, Gregory Williams
mailto:greg...@g
mapped.
Regards,
Jerry
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 21:20, Gregory Williams
mailto:greg...@gregorywilliams.me.uk>> wrote:
All,
I've also been working on a comparison tool for OSM solar mapping, as compared
with the FiT register. I've just placed an initial version here:
http://osm.gregorywilliams
All,
I've also been working on a comparison tool for OSM solar mapping, as compared
with the FiT register. I've just placed an initial version here:
I note that the FiT register data does have the LLSOA for each entry. So I
think that could be used as a means of measuring completeness in a more
granular manner than local authority or the first half of the postcode. The OSM
data can also be determined per LLSOA. Both the number of
Last night I updated my solar mapping comparison tool to include coverage of
Scotland. Unfortunately it had only covered England and Wales up until now
because my comparison with the FiT register data was performed at the LSOA
level. For Scotland, the comparison is being performed just at the
rth and
> Vale Royal.
> gurglypipe continues to spread out beyond Lancaster into South Lakes
> to the N & Ribbledale and to the S
> brianboru continues to pick up a significant number of installations
> across Herefordshire & the Welsh Valleys as part of general mapping
> wo
Thanks Russ!
I was only thinking of a similar idea just the other day. I've already
gone through probably a couple of hundred installations. Perhaps a
future extensions could allow:
- A "Are you sure that's a PV system?" option -- I've seen perhaps a
couple where I'm not sure whether it's
I've now got round to updating the code on my solar comparison site to
cater for these different ways of tagging the orientation. It considers
these tags in this order:
- generator:orientation=*
- direction=*
- tilted=no
Regular users of the site may have noticed that I also recently added
Thanks Jerry, and thanks to everyone that's continued to contribute
more coverage.
The next quarter's update to the FiT register should be published in
the next few days. So I hope to find time to update the site to use
that soon.
I continue to be amazed at the steady progress in the coverage.
On Sun, 2020-11-08 at 15:17 +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 19/10/2020 20:14, Gregory Williams wrote:
> > I've now got round to updating the code on my solar comparison site
> Suggestion for further improvement: When a building is identifiable
> associated with a set of generat
63 matches
Mail list logo