On 29/06/2011 22:56, SomeoneElse wrote:
For info - I've dropped them a mail (hopefully friendly in tone) about
it.
... and they've said that it was OK to roll back their changes, which
I've done.
Cheers,
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8573585
(this might still be at the stage at which a clean reversion is possible)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
On 06/29/11 15:58, SomeoneElse wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8573585
Changeset comment Ashbourne map - plain might point to user wanting to
make a nice no-frills map for himself and not thinking about the
consequences ;)
Bye
Frederik
Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 06/29/11 15:58, SomeoneElse wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8573585
Changeset comment Ashbourne map - plain might point to user wanting to
make a nice no-frills map for himself and not thinking about the
consequences ;)
That and the fact that
On 29 June 2011 16:12, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
There was a similar case to this on the Help Centre recently:
http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/5839/map-changes-for-personal-use-is-this-right
I suggest we need to make it more obvious to first-time users that
On 29/06/2011 16:41, Peter Miller wrote:
... and tools can highlight 'changes made by new editors that you
might want to check' etc.
You're ahead of yourself on that one - it was ITO's osm mapper that
highlighted cja's edits to me! Luckily as well as the deletions they'd
added one new way
On 29/06/2011 15:57, Lester Caine wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 06/29/11 15:58, SomeoneElse wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8573585
Changeset comment Ashbourne map - plain might point to user wanting to
make a nice no-frills map for himself and not thinking about the
7 matches
Mail list logo
