On 9 March 2012 23:00, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
I don't want to steal Andy's thunder, but I thought I'd check the progress
and what good timing!
. My reported geometry issues are solved.
. Many more areas have been processed (~ 1/3 of DfT areas including my local
area*)
On 24 January 2012 03:09, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
The Taunton Sedgemoor import data seems pretty messed up.
Eg Mansuel Road, seems have picked out wrong points (over 5+ miles away) to
generate crazily wrong geometry.
Thanks Robert - I'll have a look at that and
On 24 January 2012 03:09, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
The Taunton Sedgemoor import data seems pretty messed up.
Eg Mansuel Road, seems have picked out wrong points (over 5+ miles away) to
generate crazily wrong geometry.
Thanks Robert - I'll have a look at that and find out
On 16 November 2011 09:20, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I previously discussed[1] what our plans were with regards to the
cycling data that is coming out of the DfT.
Hi again,
I've now received lots more data on this project, again for soliciting
feedback. Current areas
Hi All,
I previously discussed[1] what our plans were with regards to the
cycling data that is coming out of the DfT.
It's now got to the stage where I'm soliciting beta testing and
feedback on the approach. The project has its own page on the wiki at
[mailto:gravityst...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 November 2011 09:21
To: Talk-GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Beta test of cycling date merge-tool
Hi All,
I previously discussed[1] what our plans were with regards to the cycling
data
that is coming out of the DfT.
It's now got to the stage where I'm soliciting beta
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:gravityst...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 November 2011 09:21
To: Talk-GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Beta test of cycling date merge-tool
Hi All,
I previously discussed[1] what our plans were with regards to the cycling
data
that is coming out
On 16 November 2011 14:08, Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
Just had a quick look at the Nottingham one - seams to be an even bigger
work of fiction than the local cycle maps produced by the council (unless
council publications override public footpath signs) - one jumping out
straight
On 16 November 2011 11:52, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Andy,
Just some observations from Birmingham that may be useful.
I'm assuming that you have been able to look at the dft data to see how
relevant it is?
I haven't seen any of the data for any place that I'm personally
Thanks for telling us how to toggle the various layers - quite neat (the
visible but not click-able even more handy!)
The rest of this message may appear to be a bit negative, but it's not
supposed to be - hopefully it's constructive feedback!
What would be useful is for there to be a way of
10 matches
Mail list logo
