[Talk-GB] OSM Analysis: highlighting missing roads over those without a name

2011-06-10 Thread Graham Stewart
Peter (et al), I think everyone agrees that the OSM Analysis Summary ( http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main ) is extremely useful for gauging our efforts and highlighting areas that need work - even if there is clearly some disagreement about how we then use the OS data on the

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis: highlighting missing roads over those without a name

2011-06-10 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Graham Stewart wrote: I think everyone agrees that the OSM Analysis Summary ( http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main ) is extremely useful for gauging our efforts and highlighting areas that need work - even if there is clearly some disagreement about how

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis: highlighting missing roads over those without a name

2011-06-10 Thread Graham Stewart
I am pretty sure it already does that. See Back Crossflats Place at Yep, so I'd like to see that kind of mismatch (where OS Locator says there is a street called Back Crossflats Place and OSM doesn't have any way of any name at that location) presented in a separate list or perhaps in a

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis: highlighting missing roads over those without a name

2011-06-10 Thread Peter Miller
On 10 June 2011 11:30, Graham Stewart gra...@dalmuti.net wrote: I am pretty sure it already does that. See Back Crossflats Place at Yep, so I'd like to see that kind of mismatch (where OS Locator says there is a street called Back Crossflats Place and OSM doesn't have any way of any name at

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Analysis: highlighting missing roads over those without a name

2011-06-10 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Graham Stewart wrote: End users of the map are much more likely to be put off by missing roads than missing road names. That is something I agree with. And it's also a lot easier to get somebody to add a name, or go through the trouble of adding a whole new complicated