Peter (et al),
I think everyone agrees that the OSM Analysis Summary (
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main ) is extremely
useful for gauging our efforts and highlighting areas that need work -
even if there is clearly some disagreement about how we then use the OS
data on the
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Graham Stewart wrote:
I think everyone agrees that the OSM Analysis Summary (
http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main ) is extremely
useful for gauging our efforts and highlighting areas that need work -
even if there is clearly some disagreement about how
I am pretty sure it already does that. See Back Crossflats Place at
Yep, so I'd like to see that kind of mismatch (where OS Locator says
there is a street called Back Crossflats Place and OSM doesn't have
any way of any name at that location) presented in a separate list or
perhaps in a
On 10 June 2011 11:30, Graham Stewart gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
I am pretty sure it already does that. See Back Crossflats Place at
Yep, so I'd like to see that kind of mismatch (where OS Locator says
there is a street called Back Crossflats Place and OSM doesn't have
any way of any name at
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Graham Stewart wrote:
End users of the map are much more likely to be put off by missing roads
than missing road names.
That is something I agree with. And it's also a lot easier to get
somebody to add a name, or go through the trouble of adding a whole new
complicated
5 matches
Mail list logo