Ed Avis [mailto:e...@waniasset.com] wrote:
Sent: 04 April 2011 11:08 AM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Rebooting the NAPTAN import?
I've stopped tagging route_ref because according to the wiki the preferred
way to map bus routes is as a relation. Does that reflect
Grimshaw [mailto:stuart.grims...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2011 2:19 PM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Rebooting the NAPTAN import?
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM
sk53_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
a) Do not import any NaPTAN data in areas where imports
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
For those not aware, Christoph Böhme put together NOVAM:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Novam
Oh, that is awesome. But instead of deleting the n:verified tag, I have
set it to yes everywhere and sadly Novam sees that as
(blackadder-lists)
Cc: 'Stuart Grimshaw'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Rebooting the NAPTAN import?
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
For those not aware, Christoph Böhme put together NOVAM:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Novam
Oh
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
I thought Christoph had it working with the various formats of
verified. Try changing the scheme (bottom right) and see if that
changes anything
I've tried already... and although it does change things, it doesn't do
the
the
naptan in front.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Derick Rethans [mailto:o...@derickrethans.nl]
Sent: 04 April 2011 10:34 AM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Cc: 'Derick Rethans'; 'Stuart Grimshaw'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Rebooting the NAPTAN import
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
The Birmingham scheme should show a naptan:verified=yes as green
(assuming all other tags ok) as that's what I asked Christoph to add
because I was doing the same as you, I.e. adding naptan:verified=yes
rather than deleting the
On 4 April 2011 11:08, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
I've stopped tagging route_ref because according to the wiki the preferred
way
to map bus routes is as a relation. Does that reflect the accepted
practice in
this country?
As have I, so I have to keep switching between schemes in
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Ed Avis wrote:
I've stopped tagging route_ref because according to the wiki the preferred way
to map bus routes is as a relation. Does that reflect the accepted practice
in
this country?
Same here.
What uses the bus route data anyway?
I do :-) And Harry:
Derick Rethans osm@... writes:
What uses the bus route data anyway?
I do And Harry:
http://www.harrywood.co.uk
/blog/2011/03/28/bus-route-rendering-at-rewiredstate/
My question was really a way to ask 'what format should bus routes be
tagged in so that software can use them?'. I _think_ that
On 04/04/2011 11:08, Ed Avis wrote:
I've stopped tagging route_ref because according to the wiki the preferred way
to map bus routes is as a relation. Does that reflect the accepted practice in
this country?
What uses the bus route data anyway?
Potentially anyone with a Garmin following the
On 4 April 2011 11:26, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
The trouble is, route_ref is directly marked on the ground. The path
followed by a bus in the correct order, although it is more useful
information, is also harder to discover. In the time it took to ride
on a bus from Croydon to
What we seem to be edging towards is a mixed tagging of route_ref and relations,
being respectively the 'rough' and 'proper' way to tag bus routes, and the need
for some lint-like tool to reconcile the two - at least as far as migrating data
from route_ref to the ideal tagging.
If you just wish
On 4 April 2011 19:36, Stuart Grimshaw stuart.grims...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with tagging routes on a map is that they change s often.
We saw during Sheffield's Transport Hack Day this weekend when the
guys from our local travel authority showed us how bus routes don't
just change from
Stuart Grimshaw wrote:
Some routes stop after a certain time of day, or they follow
a different route at weekends. They follow a different route
for 1 journey before or after school and they go to different
stops because of roadworks.
To keep this information accurate you really would
On 04/04/2011 19:36, Stuart Grimshaw wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Ed Avise...@waniasset.com wrote:
What we seem to be edging towards is a mixed tagging of route_ref and relations,
being respectively the 'rough' and 'proper' way to tag bus routes, and the need
for some lint-like tool
On 3 April 2011 10:28, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've found this in swathes of south London - pairs of naptan and
non-naptan bus stops along major roads, suggesting that it's been
years of things not being fixed up before I noticed. I was quite
surprised to see that given that
community
monitors in place?
Cheers
STEVE
From: Tom Chance [t...@acrewoods.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 11:28 AM
To: Andy Allan
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Rebooting the NAPTAN import?
On 3 April 2011 10:28, Andy Allan
gravityst
On 03/04/11 14:19, Stuart Grimshaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM
sk53_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
a) Do not import any NaPTAN data in areas where imports have already taken
place. Experience shows that detailed survey correction of NaPTAN data is
not to be
On 02/04/2011 15:14, Stuart Grimshaw wrote:
This weekend sees Sheffield's first Transport Hackday, hosted at
theGistLab[3], we've got a bunch of guys sitting here with various
apps we've written or would like to write and one of the projects we
identified as a potential target for today would be
20 matches
Mail list logo
