On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:57:42 +0300, Komяpa m...@komzpa.net wrote:
and point it to URL http://kothic.org/js/
Hey, just wanted to say that it looks awsome!
Great work there!
Sebastian
pgpXZFSjB963I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
talk mailing list
Peter Miller wrote:
I wound be very interested to see the first time that a transport
authority took a person to court for promoting their services but
there may be a first time! I do suggest that this is a different
project from OSM though.
Like this?
Berlin Metro Bans Free iPhone
Nic Roets wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Till Harbaum / Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've been told that the yahoo license permits derivative works which also
is the reason why potlatch and josm are making use of this. Wouldn't a
server distrubuting slightly
Per wrote:
Now we can see a big discussion, but no one did anything constructive!
One thing is clear, we need a tag to describe the usability of ways.
If you don't like smoothness invent a better scheme!
Smoothness is better than nothing.
surface=cobblestones/paved/gravel/sand/dirt/grass
80n wrote:
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more
roads please? ;)
Same here. Or at the very least rename some roads please :-)
spaetz
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Frederik Ramm wrote:
All OS are doing is clarifying that a normal OS customer will probably
*not* have the right to grant others (Google) a perpetual, irrevocable,
worldwide, royalty-free license.
This is true for OSM as well; my reading is that we must not display OSM
data (say, a KML
David Carmean wrote:
I want to place some hilltop/mountaintop peak nodes, and I see that
there's a discrepancy between the instructions on the Features page
and what, for example, Osmarender wants. Osmarender seems to want
elevation while the wiki recommendation is for ele. What does
Gervase Markham wrote:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.64685mlon=-0.14641zoom=15
But then how would you get a marker on the Osmarender layer?
Cutting the stuff out of the export tab thing, I get:
David Earl wrote:
On 07/11/2008 06:48, Joshua Scotton wrote:
Hi,
I added some streets recently on an industrial estate and tagged them
highway=road as I'm not sure what other tag to use.
They are roads on a uk industrial estate with the normal white lines in
the middle of the road.
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Come on. There is no the renderer, you can set up your own if you
like. Anyone can.
Of course, I could climb on the top of the mount everest - in theory.
In practise I would need a lot of time to learn how to do that.
Yes so what? I learned how osmarender styles worked
Matthias Julius wrote:
IMHO, if someone has the authority to put something on Map Features
someone also has the authority to change or remove something or mark
it as deprecated.
Let me disagree. You are implying that just because I can add stuff to
map features, I can also decide to mark all
Joseph Gentle wrote:
Can we get a vague show of hands about what people think of this? I
don't think its worth discussing for more than a day or so. If this
issue is too contentious, we can let contributors decide with an
option on their user page or something.
+1 wikipedia version
If you
Peter Miller wrote:
Richard: Can I assume that you are in agreement with the 'brief brief' or do
you want to suggest any changes? We really don't want people to stay silent
now and then raise issues if we produce a licence that delivers on exactly
that description.
I like the way CC (used
Nick Barnes wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
One example to which I took exception is ... changing Strasse in the name
to
Straße, which is the correct spelling (but nonetheless Strasse is
often found on signs).
Straße may well be the correct spelling in German speaking countries,
but it
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I am in favour of setting up a code of conduct for automated edits.
Hi Frederik,
while i have full understanding and sympathize with your approach, I am
doubtful about its outcome.
Those who will read and follow the code of conduct are not
Lauri Hahne wrote:
I think some standard form should be used if we ever want to do
something like this. Although IPA is the official standard, it isn't
very computer or user friendly. Therefore I think something like
SAMPA, MRPA or X-SAMPA should be used. These are used to some extend
among
elvin ibbotson wrote:
As I understand it the numbers are not the problem, it
arises from people not knowing which is the right number to use (eg.
England/Scotland border admin_level 2 or 4?). This is why I think
numbers are useful in the data but users should not have to know what
numbers to
Neil Penman wrote:
I've found a few of the blue unknown type tiles in
Europe shown by
Osmarender. There is one in the UK just west of
Exeter and several in
France south of Bourges. Anyone know what is causing
the problem?
The lowzoom stitcher downloads from the new captionless layer.
Florian Lohoff wrote:
BTW: Are navit map binarys files endianess clean? I mean do i386
generated binfiles work on PPC or mips(big endian)?
Or does it work to generate 32bit i386 files run with an x86_64
navit?
The precompiled binary maps will run on a PPC just as well as on i386.
However,
Inge Wallin wrote:
3. Marble is not only an application, it's also an embeddable widget that you
can use in other applications. So if you want to show some OSM in any
application, use the marble widget and you're done.
Phantastic work, Inge and others, thanks. Just as a piece of
On Tue, 13 May 2008 23:25:39 +0200 Raphaël Jacquot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the boundary of the forrest run in parallel to the road is actually
the correct way to do it.
this is what you say. I say sharing nodes of the forest and the road
is actually the correct way to do it. Why can't people
Shaun McDonald wrote:
If you have a road and stream running parallel they would be entered
as 2 ways that are parallel. The same happens for the carriageways of
a motorway that are separated by a barrier.
Well, let's say that this is also controversial and we had that
discussion before.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Once we have a few applications in place that get viewed by *many*
people, we could just have a button somewhere along the margin of the
page that says: I know the area and what I see here looks correct.
Given that this will be the default very soon ( :-) ), I'd rather
Frustrated by the lack of a nice map viewing tool for my eee pc, I have
written my own hack. It's a local OpenLayers installation that is served
by a python script (stock python, no additional libs). If the tile does
not exist yet, it will be downloaded from the OSM tile server and be
stored
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Frustrated by the lack of a nice map viewing tool for my eee pc, I have
written my own hack. It's a local OpenLayers installation that is served
by a python script (stock python, no additional libs). If the tile does
not exist yet, it will be downloaded from the OSM
Nick Black wrote:
Great idea - this could be really useful.
I get lots of errors running on OS X 10.5.2 though:
File ./pymap, line 47, in do_GET
if e.errno == os.errno.ENOENT:
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'errno'
I guess
Andy Allan wrote:
I'll need to check this out - I've found it frustrating trying to demo
the map even if I'm carrying my laptop around. On the vague chance
that there's wireless available, all I get is ooh, that's really
slow when it's the crappy wireless that's the problem :-) Simple
local
Nick Black wrote:
Cool - its all working now.
Is there any cache expiry for tiles or is it a case of deleting the
tile directory?
No expiry so far, but it would be easy to make it so. All the pieces are
ready, basically.
Until then, just deleting old tiles must do.
find tiles -mtime 30
Robin Paulson wrote:
is there any intention to include contours on the main map at any
point? would it be possible to have them as a static layer (i.e. they
not be re-rendered every week like the mapnik images, to save
processing time), with a transparent background?
alternatively, are
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I think the biggest problem for commercial users is probably the fact
that they can't get legal info from us - if they ask can we do X
then our response will always be read the license and ask a lawyer.
I agree, that is very unsatifactory. It is even inconvenient to me as
Nick Black wrote:
Seriously, you can't actually expect OSM to change its license because
of what a well-intentioned small company might do.
No, but as long as we can't even tell a company that might use maps in
their books on whether those books will be under the CC_BY_SA or just
the images
Gervase Markham wrote:
The notion of derivative works is a fairly well defined one under
copyright law. Many, many companies deal with this concept every day.
-Right, so having an overlay with proprietary data on an OSM map is
derived? As a separate layer? If it's merged in one image instead,
Christian Nold wrote:
Any chance someone could implement an SVG export from Osmarender from
the website or look at some of the issues of the Mapnik one?
You might want to talk to Mario, our Google Summer of code student who
is working on customized osmarender output.
Sebastian
Vincent MEURISSE wrote:
I don't understand why some users want their work in PD.
The goal of osm is to have a map of the world freely available for
anyone. But with PD someone (eg google) can take all the work of osm,
correct and complete it, and copyright it in a way that osm cannot
reuse
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I really like
http://www.openstreetmap.de/123/
you like it just because step 4 out of the 123 is start potlatch.
admit it! ;-)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Tom Hughes wrote:
[snip]
if ($email=~/should/ and $email !~ /I will make it so/) then
{print work harder unpaid slaves!}
Well the dev server is over that way if somebody wants to volunteer to
setup and run such a service. I'm sure Spaetz will oblige with an
account on dev if required.
Hakan Tandogan wrote:
I am an self-employed Computer Scientist with lots of experience in
databases and web applications. I live and work in Germany.
Hi Hakan (I can probably talk in German with you :-))
thanks for volunteering, I have accepted you as a mentor. You can now
click on any
Nick Black wrote:
And because they derive from Google Maps, more importantly.
I think we should be a bit more careful with such statements. Nowhere on
the geonames page do they say that data is, or should be, derived from
Google Maps.
What? Geonames allows you to move and edit data which
Hi all,
Google summer of code application deadline has passed. We have received
27 applications. I have stripped out sensitive information such as
e-mail addresses and other contact information (and also a full CV) and
put the on this wiki page:
Hi all,
Google summer of code application deadline has passed. We have received
27 applications. I have stripped out sensitive information such as
e-mail addresses and other contact information (and also a full CV) and
put the on this wiki page:
Sven Grüner wrote:
I've recently created a sandbox going the whole way from Planet Earth
to Some Road all in nested relations. You can browse it here:
http://osm.schunterscouts.de/relation-browser.php
(the URL accepts other relations as well, comments welcome)
You do know that sometimes
Steve Chilton wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/wm.shtml to listen live
Or follow RichardF's live transcripts in IRC interspersed with commentary.
Thanks Richard :-).
spaetz
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Robert Vollmert wrote:
I may be missing something, but why would we need to introduce a read-
only attribution tag if we already have it? It's the source tag of the
first version of an object, in
http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/objtype/id/history
+1
Sebastian
Kyle Gordon wrote:
I know this has already been answered, but it would be awesome if [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
could be accessed through the BOINC framework (especially as deployment
to multiple computers would just involve an MSI and MST file).
Anyone reckon if it's at all possible to get all
David Earl wrote:
It's a hard call. I did do a kind of weighting in the where am I
feature to give a reasonable spread of places of different kinds -
though again Tom hasn't implemented this in quite the same way on the
home page.
I agree that it's a hard call (and trade-off). Also, I
Lars Aronsson wrote:
J.D. Schmidt wrote:
It doesn't matter if the busstop is on the right or left side of
the road... Neither OSM wise, nor in the real world. In the real
world you use your eyes and see the busstop.
Of course it matters which side the bus stop is on. You don't
want to
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
The way we usually do things around here is those who do the work get
to decide how it's done.
Interestingly, your vineyard example is exactly working that way. YOU
have decided that you want to have vineyards in the way you like it. YOU
have
Steve Hill wrote:
Contours layer presented by openpistemap is simply great. Does it
exist a server publishing only this layer?
There is still the relief layer available, using addresses like
http://srtm.in-ulm.de/layer/relief/z8/row89/8_134-89.jpg
The tutorial on how to use these is here:
Mikel Maron wrote:
http://www.opengeodata.org/?p=284
Cool. Would many students please apply now between March 24 and March
31st for a project on our Wiki?
A link to our wiki page and idea pool is here:
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/streetmap/about.html
Sebastian
mariner wrote:
As a result of the OpenExpo in Bern I started to contribute to the
project. Thank you guys, for attending at the fair.
Hey, cool to see that our stall actually helped.
In the wiki I saw, that there are people wich are using a Nokia 9500
(Communicator) while doing some work for
OpenExpo, Bern, Switzerland is over (1000 visitors) and I wrote an post
on my experiences there:
http://sspaeth.de/index.php?/archives/507-OpenExpo-and-OpenStreetMap-2008.html
Thanks to all involved and helping, I enjoyed it a lot.
Sebastian Spaeth
OK, here are the next steps for GSoC.
- We need students who are willing to take up one of the projects listed
on our wiki page (they can propose their own thing to us too, of
course). Students who are interested should show their interest now.
@all: If you know a promising student, let them know
OK, I have just submitted our application to Google SoC. We are in the
pool. bobkare volunteered to act as backup admin in case I drop dread.
Thanks for that.
Let's see if this works out this year. I will probably be (nearly)
non-reachable on WEdnesday and Thursday BTW, as I represent an
Sven Anders wrote:
Hi,
the Daily planet Files are broken (again):
See:
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/daily/
[ ] daily-20080303-20080304.osc.bz2 04-Mar-2008 00:2014
[ ] daily-20080304-20080305.osc.bz2 05-Mar-2008 00:20 14
[ ] daily-20080305-20080306.osc.bz2
80n wrote:
This would be an interesting thing to try.
AFAIK its relatively easy to add a new layer to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
infrastructure
and Osmarender could easily be adapted to render points from GPX files
(perhaps using a pre-processor to convert GPX elements to OSM format
nodes
Robin Paulson wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would it make sense to create a new mailing list - say
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or so - to which all tag proposals and
requests for comments/votes could be directed, and reclaim talk@ for
informal community chat?
I am all
Robin Paulson wrote:
one possible problem i can see:
it is a legal requirement of OSM to display that attribution and if
the tag is editable by anyone, then it can be changed, either through
malice, clumsiness or otherwise. this could lead to troublesome legal
wrangles
it's been talked
Hi guys,
I will be manning an OSM stand at the next OpenExpo(.ch) in Bern,
Switzerland in March. I need a poster for that. Unfortunately, I have
forgotten how people have been creating these so far. There was a
postscript renderer somewhere in CVS right? Or have people been using
Mapnik
58 matches
Mail list logo
