--- On Sun, 18/1/09, i...@4x4falcon.com i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
source=* is different, since just because you tweak a few road bends
from a GPS track doesn't mean it wasn't derived from Yahoo tracing.
I'd suggest source=yahoo;gps in that case.
Of course I'm not a copyright lawyer, but
--- On Fri, 12/12/08, Ian Sergeant iserg...@hih.com.au wrote:
From: Ian Sergeant iserg...@hih.com.au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] What gives with roundabouts?
To: bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com
Cc: Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Received: Friday, 12 December, 2008, 9:10 AM
bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1
I completely agree with all of Darrin's points.
I was unaware of the decision on the mailing list when I started mapping a
about 1.5 years ago. I read the descriptions on the wiki and went with a proper
roundabout for suburban roundabouts, since they don't fit the definition of the
[Sorry, first post went to Thomas directly, seems the list doesn't set reply-to
field to the talk-au list :( ]
Hi Thomas,
It works for me like this (it's hard to put in words, but here goes)...
* Have two separate ways, that you want to join into one way (not for a
T-intersection or a crossing)
4 matches
Mail list logo