Re: [Talk-it] MapQuest Open

2016-05-26 Per discussione girarsi_liste
Il 26/05/2016 16:03, Any File ha scritto: > 2016-05-26 10:20 GMT+02:00 EugPez : >> Nell'editor di OpenStreetMap si può scegliere come livello MapQuest Open. >> Dopo aver scelto questo livello, non vedo le modifiche che ho fatto qualche >> giorno fa. >> Come si aggiorna quella

Re: [Talk-it] MapQuest Open

2016-05-26 Per discussione Any File
2016-05-26 10:20 GMT+02:00 EugPez : > Nell'editor di OpenStreetMap si può scegliere come livello MapQuest Open. > Dopo aver scelto questo livello, non vedo le modifiche che ho fatto qualche > giorno fa. > Come si aggiorna quella mappa? L'aggiornamento è automatico, ma non

[Talk-it] MapQuest Open

2016-05-26 Per discussione EugPez
Nell'editor di OpenStreetMap si può scegliere come livello MapQuest Open. Dopo aver scelto questo livello, non vedo le modifiche che ho fatto qualche giorno fa. Come si aggiorna quella mappa? C'è un aggiornamento automatico? Dopo quanto tempo? Grazie Ciao Eugenio (EugPez) -- View this message

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps now has proper state shields

2012-12-13 Per discussione Craig Hinners
I like the fact that they took some artistic license and used "stylized", or "iconified" shields, rather than trying to do a perfect pixel-per-pixel resize of the prototype shields. The latter method does not necessarily produce good on-screen results.(Which is to be expected, given that the

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps now has proper state shields

2012-12-10 Per discussione James Mast
I've also noticed that they are using their own state border files instead of the ones in OSM. Here's an example of this at the WV/VA crossing of WV-9/VA-9: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.26253lon=-77.7658zoom=16layers=Q You can still see the OSM border there, but it isn't as defined as

[Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps now has proper state shields

2012-12-09 Per discussione James Mast
I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to include state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for starters. Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state abbreviation for the ref tags on the ways instead of not having them at all

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps now has proper state shields

2012-12-09 Per discussione Michal Migurski
On Dec 9, 2012, at 7:37 PM, James Mast wrote: I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to include state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for starters. Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state abbreviation for the ref tags on

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps now has proper state shields

2012-12-09 Per discussione Michal Migurski
On Dec 9, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Michal Migurski wrote: I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to include state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for starters. Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state abbreviation for the ref

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps now has proper state shields

2012-12-09 Per discussione Toby Murray
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:37 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to include state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for starters. Maybe now we should all agree to use the proper state

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps now has proper state shields

2012-12-09 Per discussione Michal Migurski
On Dec 9, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Toby Murray wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:37 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: I was just looking at their tiles tonight and they've updated them to include state shields!! Saw shields for PA, SC, MD, VA, WV, CA, and NY for starters. Maybe now we

[Talk-us] MapQuest Open not updating as fast?

2012-07-26 Per discussione dion_dock
I've noticed that MapQuest Open is not regenerating tiles as fast as it used to a month or two ago. Actually, it's hard to tell if it is updating at all. Has anyone else noticed this? Maybe I missed an email. thanks, -Dion ___ Talk-us mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open not updating as fast?

2012-07-26 Per discussione James Mast
I think they are waiting till the OSM database is odbl-clean officially first before updating again. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-de] Mapquest Open ohne Tracks?

2012-03-28 Per discussione Manuel Reimer
Hallo, ich habe mir gerade mal den Mapquest-Open-Stil angeschaut. Egal welche Zoomstufe: Ich sehe nie Feldwege/Waldwege (Tracks). Besonders komisch dort, wo dann Trampelpfade als path getaggt sind. Die sind dann mitten im Wald da, aber die Waldwege dorthin fehlen. Ist das so gewollt oder ein

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-03-08 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On 2/29/2012 1:15 AM, James Mast wrote: Just wanted to let you guys know and give kudos to MapQuest for doing something that Google hasn't done with their maps EVER. MapQuest is either fully reading the ref tag or using the tags from relations, but they are now properly showing Business

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-03-08 Per discussione Paul Johnson
Still needs fixing: 'Banners' on county roads (e.g. CR 35 Alternate, CR 50 Old) C-* is a county road (in Ohio at least; it may be used for state highways in Colorado) Overlaps I believe in the OSM scheme, CR is county road. Colorado and Kansas typically stylize their state roads as C and K

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-03-08 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On 3/8/2012 2:53 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: Still needs fixing: C-* is a county road (in Ohio at least; it may be used for state highways in Colorado) I believe in the OSM scheme, CR is county road. Colorado and Kansas typically stylize their state roads as C and K roads, though the preferable

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-03-08 Per discussione Paul Johnson
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, but when a local insists on tagging it one way, what's one to do? Let 'em know about consistency. Whenever practical, we should try to be as globally consistent as possible, if for no other reason than being able

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-03-08 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On 3/8/2012 3:03 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, but when a local insists on tagging it one way, what's one to do? Let 'em know about consistency. Whenever practical, we should try to be as globally consistent as

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-03-08 Per discussione the Old Topo Depot
I'd suggest you copy o...@mapquest.com to further replies on this thread. As for consistency, perhaps adding alternate tags is a possible solution. Messy and redundant, but, yes, consistency for styling, routing, etc will continue to be an issue if ground truth is considered authoritative, and

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-03-08 Per discussione Richard Weait
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/8/2012 3:03 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com  wrote: Yes, but when a local insists on tagging it one way, what's one to do? Let 'em know about

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-29 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On 2/29/2012 1:15 AM, James Mast wrote: Just wanted to let you guys know and give kudos to MapQuest for doing something that Google hasn't done with their maps EVER. MapQuest is either fully reading the ref tag or using the tags from relations, but they are now properly showing Business

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-29 Per discussione Josh Doe
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:15 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: Just wanted to let you guys know and give kudos to MapQuest for doing something that Google hasn't done with their maps EVER. MapQuest is either fully reading the ref tag or using the tags from relations, but they

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-29 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
Another update: they now color motorway_links with toll=yes green (and display toll booths at high zooms - not sure if this is new). The overlap where a toll motorway becomes a free motorway is a bit messy though. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.45095lon=-81.28962zoom=16layers=Q

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-29 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
Oops - bad pattern matching finding I in RI :) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.8193lon=-71.4737zoom=13layers=Q ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-29 Per discussione Paul Johnson
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote: Another update: they now color motorway_links with toll=yes green (and display toll booths at high zooms - not sure if this is new). The overlap where a toll motorway becomes a free motorway is a bit messy though.

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-29 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On 2/29/2012 12:17 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com mailto:nerou...@gmail.com wrote: Another update: they now color motorway_links with toll=yes green (and display toll booths at high zooms - not sure if this is new). The

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-29 Per discussione Paul Johnson
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote: On 2/29/2012 12:17 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com mailto:nerou...@gmail.com wrote: Another update: they now color motorway_links with toll=yes green

Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-29 Per discussione James Mast
Yikes. I'll tweet them about that one. Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:49:41 -0500 From: nerou...@gmail.com To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps Oops - bad pattern matching finding I in RI :) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.8193lon=-71.4737zoom

[Talk-us] MapQuest Open Maps

2012-02-28 Per discussione James Mast
Just wanted to let you guys know and give kudos to MapQuest for doing something that Google hasn't done with their maps EVER. MapQuest is either fully reading the ref tag or using the tags from relations, but they are now properly showing Business Interstates and Truck US Highways now on

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Fwd: mapquest open aerial tiles

2011-02-10 Per discussione Emilie Laffray
Hello, just transmitting the answer officially. Emilie Laffray On 10 February 2011 16:53, Antony Pegg wrote: Thanks emilie, hi John Yes absolutely fine to trace over. Or on a website. Or cache in a mobile app...or print out, roll it up and smoke it if you want - the imagery is totally