On 2012-11-22 21:14, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
Hi
Am 22.11.2012 20:20, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2012-11-22 12:23, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
At the other way, as we do it in Holland every roundabout should be
tags in a forward and backward way in relations when the roundabout
is
split up. One of
On 11/23/2012 12:44 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2012-11-22 21:14, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
Do you accept OXOMOA scheme?
This is the first that I ever hear from that scheme.
Please ignore the original oxomoa scheme when tagging bus routes. There
is a reason the scheme sits in someones private
On 2012-11-23 14:29, Cartinus wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:44 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2012-11-22 21:14, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
Do you accept OXOMOA scheme?
This is the first that I ever hear from that scheme.
Please ignore the original oxomoa scheme when tagging bus routes.
There
is a
Am 23.11.2012 14:29, schrieb Cartinus:
On 11/23/2012 12:44 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2012-11-22 21:14, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
Do you accept OXOMOA scheme?
This is the first that I ever hear from that scheme.
Please ignore the original oxomoa scheme when tagging bus routes. There
is a
What already works is giving the stop members a role 'platform', instead of
'stop'. The tags on the stop nodes themselves cannot be converted to
public_transport=platform though, so you have to keep working with
highway=bus_stop and railway=tram_stop. Or use both, but that seems like a
waste of
Hi
Am 22.11.2012 20:20, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2012-11-22 12:23, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
At the other way, as we do it in Holland every roundabout should be
tags in a forward and backward way in relations when the roundabout is
split up. One of the reasons relation get polluted.
But your
6 matches
Mail list logo
