Re: [talk-ph] Batangas City data cleanup

Thanks for the info, Jherome. This should be fixed now. Unless I still bypassed something. Found about 7 buildings with valid names in history and reverted them in addition with the fixes on 47891655. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47893705 Ervin M. *Schadow1 Expeditions* - A Filipino

Re: [talk-ph] Batangas City data cleanup

Apologies. What I have done was to delete the name and landuse tags of buildings that have no shop and amenity tags and with a name of "residential" and "commercial". And those with shop and amenity tags were manually reverted with those that have previous names in their history. I overlooked

Re: [talk-ph] Batangas City data cleanup

By the way, it seems the user is on Facebook and it says there that she is with Batangas City's City Planning and Development Office (CPDO): https://www.facebook.com/imeeperez.veedor What I'm surprised with is she is using JOSM. This is not a typical first-user editor so she must have been

Re: [talk-ph] Batangas City data cleanup

Hi Ervin, Unfortunately, you did not really fix her edits. What you should have done instead of doing a wholesale removal of the name=* and landuse=* tags is to check what are the existing tags that were overwritten by the user. For example, you "fixed" way 360903949 by removing the name=* and

Re: [talk-ph] Batangas City data cleanup

Fixed "her" edits for the meantime. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47891655 Ervin M. *Schadow1 Expeditions* - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own motherland. http://www.s1expeditions.com On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Ouch.

Re: [talk-ph] Batangas City data cleanup

Hi jherome, Thanks for taking care of Batangas. Can you post your mail here as a ticket in https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix ill try to help fix a few i find to be inconsistent lets also track progress in the papercutfix ticket. Keep on mapping! On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 at 22:51 Jherome Miguel

[talk-ph] Batangas City data cleanup

Batangas City needs to be cleaned up, as the data there is becoming affected (some POI's are being affected). Most edits are being done on weekdays (except holidays), and most of the users are possibly city government employees, which have not disclosed their editing background. I messaged those