Thanks for this work David!
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:38 PM, David Groom wrote:
> Hopefully fixing the geometries in this area is now complete
>
> David
>
>
> On 19/03/2016 17:53, David Groom wrote:
>>
>> Its now been one month with no major objections to my proopesed
Hopefully fixing the geometries in this area is now complete
David
On 19/03/2016 17:53, David Groom wrote:
Its now been one month with no major objections to my proopesed
cnages, so I have made them, but with the suggestion made by Eugene.
However the exisiting geometry of the landuse
Its now been one month with no major objections to my proopesed cnages,
so I have made them, but with the suggestion made by Eugene.
However the exisiting geometry of the landuse polygons is very messy,
with many overlapping ways. I am fixing these, but with over 230 ways
to fix I wont able
My only reason for choosing landuse=meadow rather than landuse=farmland
was to change as few tags as possible, though I think I agree with you
and prefer landuse=farmland
David
On 14/02/2016 13:25, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
I agree with changes 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
Agree with Eugene. There are other who mapped riceland as meadows and
should be fixed as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/489780
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> I agree with changes 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
> landuse=farmland
I agree with changes 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
landuse=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being
meadows.
On 2/14/16, David Groom wrote:
> While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come
> across a number which do not
This is a good thread! And I admit, I am guilty in some of the blunders
(i.e. Barangay names) or should I say non-standard? As you all know,
there is no wrong tagging in OSM.
Perhaps we can start a wikipage for Pinoy tagging practices?
cheers,
maning
On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 11:12 +0100, [EMAIL