Hi Peter,
good stuff, and I agree with your view that we should tag the human
understandable levels. I'm not aware how how precisely these map to
the layers tag (I'd always assumed that this was a hint to the
renderer rather that conveying semantic information), however I see
how that would work.
2009/9/4 Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com
Fulfilling a very small niche, I've added a (very short) page for
monorails
(in the UK): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_monorails
we should build more monorails so we can map more monorails ...
+1 :-)
The page for the tag
In the absence of a vast building program of new monorails[1] as
proposed by Bill Ricker, I am beginning to think about mapping some of
the more complex transport interchanges here in the UK. I am currently
adding platforms, walkways and steps to the simpler stations that I
know and am
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
We would also need to consider slope, steps and lifts between layers
and the situation where a lift only connects some layers but not all
of them. A lift is currently represented as a single node because it
is vertical. How does one indicate
On 4 Sep 2009, at 09:25, Christoph Boehme wrote:
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
We would also need to consider slope, steps and lifts between layers
and the situation where a lift only connects some layers but not all
of them. A lift is currently represented as a single node
Hi all,
I just added a new introduction to the Public Transport page (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport), trying to give an
overview of what public transport is and why it should be added to OSM.
Whilst doing this, I had a quick play with Google's Public Transit map
service,
Google Transit draws from the NCSD - National Coach Services Database -
which comes in with the regional traveline data.
I suspect ATOC don't want to get their data on google maps because they
need the advertising revenue but I might be wrong about that.
Frankie Roberto wrote:
Hi all,
I
In message on 4 Sep 2009, Frankie Roberto wrote:
The question for me is: could OSM fill in this 'gap' of functionality that
Google Transit has?
There's an old conversation at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Train_routing about whether train
routing could work without a timetable.
2009/9/4 Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com
Um, I've forgotten which way round it goes! (Desperately trying to
remember,
or at least Google the answer)...
the angle of mantenance spur tells ... do they back onto or off of the
main-line ?
Um?
I suspect that we ought to add
