2015-07-02 14:21 GMT+02:00 Nounours77 kuessemondtaegl...@gmail.com:
I think Jo is right to rise this problem. It is unclear which
stop/platform belongs to which direction of the route. Often you can decude
it from proximity, or from the side.
But I've seen quite some examples, where only the
2015-07-02 15:52 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
If you are adding stop_areas, then there certainly have to be two of them,
one on each side. One of them is put in the route that goes one way, the
other one is put in the other way. I'm also pretty sure that the
stop_area_group is
2015-07-02 16:31 GMT+02:00 Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com:
Eric
I think you are falling into the trap of trying to cover too many things
in one relationship.
It seems like your email client did not display the quote properly. The
only thing I said in the first paragraph is :
Aggregate
2015-07-01 7:38 GMT+02:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
In retrospect public_transport=platform was a misnomer. Maybe we should
have used public_transport=pole.
A platform can be a pole, or a shelter, or a dock, or a boarding platform
for a train... It is meant to abstract differences between
2015-07-01 10:53 GMT+02:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
That only works if there is one stop_area relation per direction of
travel. At the moment the wiki states to use a stop_area relation for all
PT related stuff that is near to each other. I need to relate the platform
nodes to the nearby way,
