2015-07-02 14:21 GMT+02:00 Nounours77 kuessemondtaegl...@gmail.com:
I think Jo is right to rise this problem. It is unclear which
stop/platform belongs to which direction of the route. Often you can decude
it from proximity, or from the side.
But I've seen quite some examples, where only the
Scenario:
I have data from 'upstream'.
This data relates to public_transport=platform nodes next to the way
What I need now, is to figure out which nearby way 'belongs' to this
'platform'.
If there is a stop_area relation, this is easy (as long as there is a
stop_area relation which contains a
If you are adding stop_areas, then there certainly have to be two of them,
one on each side. One of them is put in the route that goes one way, the
other one is put in the other way. I'm also pretty sure that the
stop_area_group is not needed. If they are near each other, then it's a
group. But to
2015-07-02 15:52 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
If you are adding stop_areas, then there certainly have to be two of them,
one on each side. One of them is put in the route that goes one way, the
other one is put in the other way. I'm also pretty sure that the
stop_area_group is
I think Jo is right to rise this problem. It is unclear which stop/platform
belongs to which direction of the route. Often you can decude it from
proximity, or from the side.
But I've seen quite some examples, where only the stop_positions are mapped,
and if they are quite distant, you have no
In the UK, the NaPTAN standard uses a stop area to group stops together, such
that you have one stop in each direction within the same stop area, or a whole
bus station within a stop area.
Shaun
On 2 Jul 2015, at 14:52, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are adding stop_areas,
Eric
I think you are falling into the trap of trying to cover too many things in one
relationship. A stoparea to me as a public transport person is (defined
functionally) a cluster of stoppoints at which it is possible to interchange
between services – and as such it is also a collection
2015-07-02 16:31 GMT+02:00 Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com:
Eric
I think you are falling into the trap of trying to cover too many things
in one relationship.
It seems like your email client did not display the quote properly. The
only thing I said in the first paragraph is :
Aggregate
