riding on the assumption that we'll have something like 'tiger:reviewed =
no' (with editor support) to mark unreviewed areas. Ideally, an
indication
that an address is unreviewed would be passed along by any services that
use
So, who did volunteer to write that editor-support?
What
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 11/13/09 10:43 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
O
TIGER is an incredibly huge data set. It comes from what may be the
most diverse set of primary sources of anything in the world short of
OSM itself.
It shouldn't be
For pretty much all of Florida there is parcel-by-parcel address
information available from the county. If you want to import address
information, that would be much more accurate than TIGER.
For that case, clearly the county information is vastly preferred over
TIGER. I'm curious about
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
the problem is Tiger contains tons of dead data.
No, the problem is that TIGER uses privacy-obfuscated potential
addresses, while the Karlsruhe Schema is set up for actual addresses.
Yes, in some locations the error
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
For pretty much all of Florida there is parcel-by-parcel address
information available from the county. If you want to import address
information, that would be much more accurate than TIGER.
For that case, clearly the county
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
In particular, please don't import this stuff into Hillsborough
County, Florida. Not unless you're going to use a schema which can
co-exist with actual addressing.
And don't import it at all in Orange County, Florida: they already
Anthony writes:
As for why they don't put restrictions on the data, that's likely
because (under Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service) it can't
be copyrighted under US law in the first place.
The *data* can't be copyrighted, but the format and presentation of it
can. But then
TIGER is fine if you don't have anything else. But that's not the
case where I live. It's fine to fall back on if your actual address
search fails. But adding it in a way that encourages people to
*update* the potential addresses with actual addresses defeats that
possibility.
Perhaps
On Nov 14, 2009, at 5:49 AM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
2009/11/14 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
In Denver the houses are all set back a lot further, so some way to say 'on
north-south roads, set back X feet' might help a lot. Or, in JOSM just
search for all the ways that make up the
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
TIGER is fine if you don't have anything else. But that's not the
case where I live. It's fine to fall back on if your actual address
search fails. But adding it in a way that encourages people to
*update* the potential
On 13 Nov 2009, at 23:56 , Dan Homerick wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm highly in favor of doing the import, regardless. I think the
inaccuracies will be far easier to fix than to put the addressing in
from scratch. I've
Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com writes:
Matthias Julius wrote:
Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com writes:
Dale Puch wrote:
Would it be improper to tag the true Wal-Mart services to the building
way, (either using semicolons or shop_n and amenity_n, and the
partnered services (McDonald's, etc.)
no one is interested to cleanup crap after a bad import.
No one is writing this email.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
some cautious people are
even afraid to touch tiger data because it has this Tiger is a
reference data I don't feel confident to change it label attached.
If you're scared of the tiger tags, just remove them.
Hi,
just a quick status report. The process of removing unnecessary tags
[1] has been running for 95 days now, and has processed 113 out of
roughly 175 million nodes. That's a little slower than expected and if
the process continues at that speed, I'm afraid is going to drag on into
the
What really needs to be done for TIGER addresses import is match the
streets from TIGER to those in OSM (which should be easy since they
all still have the TIGER id's) and generate the address geometry based
on these. Otherwise someone will need to do all of the geometry
corrections that
On 14 Nov 2009, at 10:22 , Dave Hansen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 23:56 -0800, Dan Homerick wrote:
i, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm highly in favor of doing the import, regardless. I
think the inaccuracies will
On 14 Nov 2009, at 18:05 , andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/11/15 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
matching Tiger id's is a very bad idea. you need to compare
geometries.
during edits ways are split, merged copied moved, deleted nodes
added node,
Most of these operations are not
What I know of it is the tiger ID came from the ID of each unique item in
the tiger DB. A road segment that had an address range was one, the next
address range was another ID. Basically each intersection to intersection.
All well and good except in OSM those would all be septate ways, so they
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
even SteveC isn't accepted as dictator. how would anyone listen to my
dictatorship
Dave was probably reacting to the wording. The phrase is often used when
making a promise or threat, as in That's just not happening while I'm
in charge.
I interpreted the
no one is interested to cleanup crap after a bad import.
I am.
tiger import was great from technical
point of view but didn't allow to build a community from scratch.
I didn't want to build anything from scratch. I'm simply not that
motivated to go out and wander everywhere mapping
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 21:35 -0500, Anthony wrote:
Unless you can point me to some documentation as to what the tiger id
*means* (*), I'm not going to think about it at all. Sometimes I keep
it, sometimes I delete it, sometimes I delete the whole way and create
a new one in its place (without
22 matches
Mail list logo
