On 2013-06-05 3:40 PM, KerryIrons wrote:
I have no problem with OSM mappers putting proposed bike routes on maps but
they should not be assigning USBR route numbers to them when they are not
approved USBRs. In some cases there is a process underway to get a route
number assigned (as I noted)
Again, a number of points of clarification are needed.
First, there is a single body in the US for assigning numbers to US Bicycle
Routes. AASHTO owns the process, just as they do for all federal highways
in the US. There can be any number of state and local bicycle routes,
proposed or
No idea what the tasking manager is.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:47 AM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
Would be useful to set up one or more Tasking Manager projects to help
manage tracing and tagging progress. I am insufficiency familiar with the
process to do this myself. --ceyockey
Are these bicycle routes being labeled USBR-## ? If they're not, I
don't see the problem. If they are being labeleed USBR-## incorrectly,
well, that's incorrect. I haven't read in detail every message on this
thread -- are there example USBR bicycle routes in OSM that we could
look at?
KerryIrons
Yes, these routes have been labeled with USBR numbers. This is the issue I
raised back in March and the only issue of concern. I asked the person who
did the labeling to remove the labels and he did not. I find subsequently
that he has been banned. Steve All of California has agreed to help in
See, that's the crux of the thing, though... firstly, be aware that NE2
was banned because he was pushing his agenda against the wishes of the
community, and taking things off-list where things couldn't be discussed
with the community, so you're just as guilty as he is right now with that
Actually Paul, people have disagreed. There are those who have taken the
position in this exchange that Who does AASHTO think they are? I and
others have tried to clarify that.
The fact that local jurisdictions are confused and distracted by the meaning
of proposed means that we can reduce
You really are making this personal Paul, but I dont understand why. I
only asked that those who might want to help clean up the mis-tagged routes
could contact me directly. Is that some sort of OSM violation?
Kerry
From: Paul Johnson [mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 06,
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:49 AM, KerryIrons irons54vor...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
Actually Paul, people have disagreed. There are those who have taken the
position in this exchange that Who does AASHTO think they are? I and
others have tried to clarify that.
Then I have to wonder why ACA is
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, KerryIrons irons54vor...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
You really are making this personal Paul, but I don’t understand why.
That's not the intent.
I only asked that those who might want to help clean up the mis-tagged
routes
could contact me directly. Is that some
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
I now see Google used for the Yard sales in the area map. Just a
guess: the Patch staff doesn't have resources for a map developer to create
that set of interactive features using MapQuest Open. It was easier for
them to just
Paul I don't understand what you are saying. You keep referring to have it
both ways and playing both sides of this coin. It appears to be
insinuating some sort of duplicitousness or nefarious behavior on the part
of Adventure Cycling.
Adventure Cycling did not propose the USBR route
Let's bring this thread back on topic please.
This isn't a cycle route ownership discussion list, this is an OSM
community in the US discussion list.
Further off-topic posts to this thread will result in moderation.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:37 PM, KerryIrons irons54vor...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
To breathe a little fresh air into this discussion (and perhaps pour
a little oil on troubled waters): I have enjoyed in the last few
hours some email exchanges with both Kerry and Paul.
In short, Kerry and I are discussing how it is inappropriate for OCM
to display a USBR as a proposed ncn
On topic, it seems silly to map (in OSM; obviously maps of such corridors are
useful in their own right) a proposed route that is nothing more than a 50 mile
wide corridor in which a route may eventually be routed, prospective USBR
number or no.
Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's bring
On 05/30/2013 11:21 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i'm planning to delete a misleading CDP in the near future, i'm pondering
the fact that from time to time we talk about deleting all the CDPs, an
idea
which i sometimes think is the right idea.
in this case, the CDP is for Niskayuna NY
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:37 PM, KerryIrons irons54vor...@sbcglobal.netwrote:
**
Adventure Cycling did not propose the USBR route numbers. The route
numbering system and the corridor plan came from AASHTO. We had
representation on the AASHTO Task Force but were only one of many members
on
17 matches
Mail list logo
