On 6/21/2013 11:59 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Looks nice so far. However, the state pages probably should pick up
subnetworks and the like (for example, Georgia's
spurs/loops/connectors, and the various Texas FM/RM/Loop/Spur/etc.)
like the US route one does(?).
Very nice - thanks for this.
Not bad! Does this mean that any new relations would automatically be added to
the page (like one for the new I-2 in TX when it's posted this year)?
Also, thanks to that new Interstate page, I noticed right away that the I-495
(DE) relation's ref tags weren't correct (it had ref=I 495 (DE)).
On 06/21/2013 08:07 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
The map should reflect ground reality, so unless there are hamlets in
these places, we should strive to fix them. By sharing our
experiences, we can have a better sense of how others are doing that,
and we can use that to inform our local
On 6/22/13 11:42 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On 06/21/2013 08:07 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
The map should reflect ground reality, so unless there are hamlets in
these places, we should strive to fix them. By sharing our
experiences, we can have a better sense of how others are doing that,
and we
On 22/giu/2013, at 17:42, Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
and we can use that to inform our local decisions.
But let the locals make the decisions! Don't just go deleting
hamlets based on the fact that they are unincorporated. A great many
hamlets in New York State have a strong
* Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com [2013-06-21 09:17 -0400]:
During the TIGER import, small neighborhoods were imported as hamlets.
I tend to think of the GNIS hamlets as small
places-where-people-live. Around my section of the Baltimore suburbs,
most of them are housing developments,
* Elliott Plack elliott.pl...@gmail.com [2013-06-21 21:01 -0400]:
In the city of Baltimore, we have over 250 well defined neighborhoods, yet
their boundaries are defined by a planning dept., not the people per se.
Most of the neighborhoods have nodes place=suburb, but it probably should
be
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-06-22 07:22 -0400]:
I do hope that the render will avoid using the Super relations.
My rendering doesn't use super relations (mostly[0]), because it
doesn't need to; the per-state relations contain all of the tags
needed for it to get the right
Pretty cool so far, though for the Ref, it'd help a lot if it sorted
numerically rather than alphabetically. 117A shouldn't appear before 3...
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hi,
A few of us were talking about setting up custom highway shield
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
Surveying postal addresses by opening mailboxes (illegal) or knocking on
doors doesn't seem feasible.
but the enhanced 911 addresses are basically the same as the postal
addresses and have the potential to become
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 15:28:12 -0400
From: phi...@pobox.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] ref tags
* James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com [2013-06-22 07:22 -0400]:
the segment of I-26 between I-240 and Exit #9 is still considered to
be a Future Interstate and
I get that you say that keeping wiki pages up to date with the status of route
relations is a pain, but I do hope that this new form of tagging routes will
get explained on the wiki. The wiki is really useful (even with experienced
mappers like me) as documentation for how to use tags, and it’s
From: Richard Welty [mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] what do we mean by geocoding?
On 6/21/13 9:39 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 6/21/2013 1:42 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
Surveying postal addresses by opening mailboxes (illegal) or knocking
on doors doesn't seem feasible.
Route relation tagging is explained on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Road_routes
On 6/22/2013 7:21 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote:
I get that you say that keeping wiki pages up to date with the status of
route relations is a pain, but I do hope that this new form of
On 6/22/13 9:04 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
...lots of good points...
Something else worth noting is this isn't an either-or situation for
geocoding. There is no reason you can't have both the street address and
postal address geocode to the same physical location. It is common to have
multiple
15 matches
Mail list logo
