Re: [Talk-us] admin level for US states

2014-11-24 Thread Richard Weait
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I wonder why US States are tagged as admin_level=4, wouldn't it be more consistent with the rest of the map to have them tagged as level 3? Based on which uses of admin_level=3? A quick scan of the wiki shows

Re: [Talk-us] admin level for US states

2014-11-24 Thread Jack Burke
I would point out that the legal status of U.S. States is slightly different than that of provinces (and likely of states in other countries). For one thing, U.S. States exist in their own right and do not drive their existence from a higher government (even though most of them were created by

Re: [Talk-us] admin level for US states

2014-11-24 Thread Richard Welty
On 11/24/14 9:44 AM, Richard Weait wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I wonder why US States are tagged as admin_level=4, wouldn't it be more consistent with the rest of the map to have them tagged as level 3? Based on which uses of

Re: [Talk-us] admin level for US states

2014-11-24 Thread Paul Norman
On 11/24/2014 5:00 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I wonder why US States are tagged as admin_level=4, wouldn't it be more consistent with the rest of the map to have them tagged as level 3? admin_level=4 is consistent with Canada and Australia at the very least. I believe it's also consistent

Re: [Talk-us] admin level for US states

2014-11-24 Thread Brad Neuhauser
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Jack Burke burke...@gmail.com wrote: I would point out that the legal status of U.S. States is slightly different than that of provinces (and likely of states in other countries). For one thing, U.S. States exist in their own right and do not drive their

Re: [Talk-us] admin level for US states

2014-11-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-11-24 18:05 GMT+01:00 Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com: ...and German states and Swiss cantons are admin_level=4 according to the previously-linked page. yes, I am coming from a German-Italian perspective, where Italian regions are clearly less sovereign than German states,

Re: [Talk-us] admin level for US states

2014-11-24 Thread Jack Burke
And the England/Wales and /Scotland borders are all 4, too. If we're trying to reflect geopolitical status, these should absolutely be different than provinces. OTOH, if we're just interested in drawing pretty lines -jack On November 24, 2014 12:55:04 PM EST, Martin Koppenhoefer

Re: [Talk-us] admin level for US states

2014-11-24 Thread Minh Nguyen
On 2014-11-24 05:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I wonder why US States are tagged as admin_level=4, wouldn't it be more consistent with the rest of the map to have them tagged as level 3? IIRC mappers in many regions of the world started out using even-numbered admin_levels only, skipping the

[Talk-us] Who controls data: Google Maps, others erasing Hollywood sign, but it's in OSM

2014-11-24 Thread Andrew Wiseman
Hi all, first time post here (hope I'm doing everything right.) There's an interesting article at Gizmodo about erasing the Hollywood sign from Google Maps, Bing Maps, Apple Maps etc -- people who live on roads nearby were complaining about hikers and tourists, and they got the LA City Council,

Re: [Talk-us] Rand McNally is using OSM

2014-11-24 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote: Nice to see they are using OSM but it would be nicer to see it clearly labeled as using data from OSM. Rand McNally fixed their attribution, but it seem weak. The response Ryan Walker from Rand McNally gave to my inquiry