Paul Norman writes:
The most important change is probably setting appropriate surface
information. I don't know the exact secret sauce magic of
cycle.travel, but surface information is very important for
selecting reasonable routes on a bike - or indeed, any non-foot
method of transportation.
SteveA wrote:
Richard (Fairhurst), if cycle.travel/map's router logic is not
paying attention to surface= tags, perhaps it should, as
doing so truly can improve selected routes
It very much does - it'll look at surface=, and failing that tracktype= or
smoothness=, as one of the principal
Minh Nguyen writes:
You aren't alone. I stopped bothering with tiger:reviewed tags back in
the Potlatch 1 days. It just isn't a well-designed tag:
- not very discoverable to mappers who weren't around in 2008
Makes ways a sickly yellow if you edit using JOSM.
- doesn't say whether
3 matches
Mail list logo
