On Saturday, June 27, 2015 04:28:26 PM T M wrote:
Did you contact Univ of MD Eastern Shore? If not I can put you in contact
with their GIS professor?
I haven't, mostly because it's outside of our intended geographic area of
interest*, but I certainly wouldn't be against it. One of the people
Would this be better in OpenHistoricalMap?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/33.44692/-112.09043
*Regards,*
*Hans*
*http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13*
*Sorry for any misspellings*
Hey all,
Apologies for the plug but I just can’t think of a better place to ask. Telenav
currently has a couple open positions for OSM editors at our HQ in Sunnyvale,
California! Here is the link to the job description, you can apply directly
from there - http://t.co/k1xURXw4r9
If you want to
Is there any feature on the ground that can be surveyed? From the image it
doesn't appear that the site has any historical markers that can be mapped.
If so, I would say it doesn't belong in OSM. You'l' have to ask OHM if
they think it belongs there.
You should also contact the editor. I'm sure
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site
Thanks for pointing out the wiki page on archaeological sites. I wasn't
aware it was documented.
--
@osm_seattle
osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
I think there's also this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303225395
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
On 6/29/15 3:58 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Is there any feature on the ground that can be surveyed? From the
image it doesn't appear that the
On 6/29/15 3:58 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Is there any feature on the ground that can be surveyed? From the
image it doesn't appear that the site has any historical markers that
can be mapped. If so, I would say it doesn't belong in OSM. You'l'
have to ask OHM if they think it belongs there.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think there's also this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303225395
That was the feature I pick up on and did look any further.
--
@osm_seattle
osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human
On 6/29/15 4:58 PM, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
I think there's also this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303225395
ah, missed that.
depends on whether the requirements of
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site
are met; if they are, then OSM is correct. otherwise i
Russ,
Thanks for the additional information. Perhaps hgv=destination?
I am pretty sure that if one showed up at one of the Estes Park entrances
with a semi and told them that you had to make a delivery in Granby they
wouldn't let you through. The next time I am up there I will ask.
Mike
On
Mike,
Highway 34 has a bit different rules, I remember when I was living in Fort
Collins and working in Granby we could pass through the park for free and
actually drove our ‘commercial pickup trucks and wood chippers in tow’ (which
is a whole other story with potential tree pest/disease
Dang, sorry; just caught my typo, hgv=private may NOT be the proper tag.
From: Russell Deffner [mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 8:02 PM
To: 'Mike Thompson'
Cc: 'Open Street Map Talk-US'
Subject: RE: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park
Hi again Mike,
Russ,
Thanks for the helpful information. I should have mentioned it is US 36 in
question (I haven't looked at US 34 yet - east of Deer Junction anyway). In
any event, it sounds like you had special permission (since you didn't have
to pay an entrance fee at all). In which case hgv=private (Only
13 matches
Mail list logo
